> > So, I understand based on Hector's feedback that it is not trivial and > might take years. I did not expect it to be trivial, but we surely do not > have years. What we could have is 4000 developers working on it. We could > spend 6 months working with the best scientists in education to develop > specific program to train professional with a specific skillset to perform > with AS3. We could leverage the power of IBM Watson to find anomalies in > code as it is checked in with infinite scaling and full autimation. > > Things don't often go that way with software development, more people doesn't necessarily mean less time, there are tasks that cannot be done in parallel or by more than one person. Also, there are certain things in development where automatic testing is not 100% possible or worth the time.
That aside, I agree with the others in that you seem to have a rather aggressive attitude and you should change that, but I also agree in that I find this to be a rather valid place to have this discussion even if this is not strictly Flex related. Another person maybe worth considering is https://twitter.com/zwetan the author of RedTamarin. Although I think that part of the code may be the easier part, maybe because it's more or less related to what I often do, for me making a renderer as good as the one in Flash/LightSpark would be harder, as I don't have enough knowledge in low level graphics or GPUs, although I'd love to. I've made a lot of work with graphics, blitting, video, audio... but always at a higher level.
