The files are xml files. So an Apache license seems to be correct. The xml files contain text from public domain which is not a problem either, so I don’t see any issue there at all.
On Jan 24, 2015, at 11:51 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> Ha, that's what I get for not double checking justin. I'll revert in a bit. > > The text in question had an Apache licence on it, and as I stated that's > incorrect. Were did I ask you to remove it from version control? > > Justin
