Also, it looks like a lot of the running swf files load example content from this server: http://aspexamples.adobe.com
Ex: click on the "View Running Example" button in the bottom on this page: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf6568f-7ffc.html The swf file loads, tries to load something from http://aspexamples.adobe.com/chart_examples/expenses.aspx but fails silently. It would be great if we get the contents of that server as well. Although we might need an ASP.net server to run this content, we may be at least able to reuse the content. Thanks, Om On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Infra confirmed that only trunk gets pub’d and I test I ran also seems to > prove that. I’ve put the files in the flexdocs branch > (site/branches/flexdocs). > > After the .html files were signed off, someone on our docs team found a > folder of .mxml files that are supposedly the examples used in the .html > files. There seem to be more mxml files in this folder than there are > examples listed in the .html files so I’m not quite sure if these are the > right files yet or not. > > My current thinking is that if a sampling of these files match up against > the .html, I’ll put the files that I know are mentioned in the .html files > into some repo somewhere (also SVN or flex-examples?). If I try to commit > the whole folder it would need a whole donation process again. Since we > were going to extract the MXML from the HTML if we didn’t find this > folder, I can argue that the results are the same as doing so, but only > for the ones I can prove match up. > > -Alex > > On 4/27/15, 12:24 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <nicho...@spoon.as> wrote: > > >You are correct. That would be the best way to go. > > > >-Nick > > > >On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only trunk > >> gets pub’d? > >> > >> -Alex > >> > >> On 4/27/15, 4:48 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <nicho...@spoon.as> wrote: > >> > >> >I've got a window to work on it later this week. I had a project get > >>put > >> >on hold so I'm pretty free Wednesday through Friday. > >> > > >> >I don't think there is a good way to stop a single folder from being > >> >published. I think if it's in the SVN, it's in. I want to open up a > >> >ticket with INFRA to see if we can get a Lucene instance going so we > >>can > >> >actually search our docs/site as well. The more we keep adding, the > >>more > >> >complex it is to find stuff :) > >> > > >> >-Nick > >> > > >> >On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Is there a good way to keep a folder from being published? What > >>folder > >> >> should be put it in? > >> >> > >> >> BTW, over on general@, Justin is expressing a concern about the > >>wording > >> >>of > >> >> the trademark attributions. I’m not sure I understand his concern, > >>but > >> >>I > >> >> guess I’ll hold off on the commit for a few more days unless you > >>have a > >> >> window to work on it now. > >> >> > >> >> -Alex > >> >> > >> >> On 4/24/15, 4:54 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <nicho...@spoon.as> > >>wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is where > >>it > >> >> >will > >> >> >end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push it > >> >>live... > >> >> > > >> >> >-Nick > >> >> > > >> >> >On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > >>wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache. I’m > >> >>ready > >> >> >>to > >> >> >> commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use > >> >>flex-utilities, > >> >> >> but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other > >> >>trademark > >> >> >> names used in lists of products and fonts that we should change to > >> >> >> something else, which I will do right after committing the > >> >>originals. So > >> >> >> the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -Alex > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Vote passed with: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >11 +1 binding votes > >> >> >> > 2 +1 non-binding votes > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded so we > >> >>can > >> >> >> >start on the IP clearance. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >-Alex > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <t...@extravision.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>+1 > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote: > >> >> >> >>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, > >>so > >> >> >>here it > >> >> >> >>>is: > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the > >>content > >> >> >>found > >> >> >> >>>here > >> >> >> >>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff > >>you > >> >>see > >> >> >> >>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text > >>content > >> >> >>will > >> >> >> >>>be > >> >> >> >>> donated. > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe > >>admins > >> >> >>will > >> >> >> >>>send > >> >> >> >>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and then > >>we > >> >>can > >> >> >> >>>start > >> >> >> >>> the IP Clearance process. > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Here’s my +1. > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> -Alex > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> > >>>>______________________________________________________________________ > >> >> >> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email > >>Security.cloud > >> >> >> >>>service. > >> >> >> >>> For more information please visit > http://www.symanteccloud.com > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> > >>>>______________________________________________________________________ > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >
