On 4/29/15, 2:44 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>HI, > >> Our legal folks currently do not see the cleaning up of terms like >>“Flash >> content” as a requirement before publication. > >Dos that mean they it needs to be done after publication or do they don't >care at all? Well, yes it needs to be done. Don’t know if someone is going to be watching over our shoulder and how often they are going to check. It probably isn’t a high priority, but Adobe must defend the integrity of the mark. I’ve been asked to supply a list of the ways Flash is used in the content and will supposedly receive a set of replacement phrases, so stay tuned. -Alex
