On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:02 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for a release of FlexJS. It would be great to highlight and talk about > the new version of FlexJS at ApacheCon Europe on Oct 1st, 2015. > > I have been talking to various folks (outside of Apache) about FlexJS. One > feedback I've received is that the version number of 0.02 makes folks think > that it is not ready to be taken seriously. It is hard to convince folks > to start using it if it has an 'alpha only' sheen to it. I really think > that the next version should be at a 1.0 release. Even if it is not > perfect, the FlexJS already has a lot of strong things going for it. I > don't think we should keep it under the covers anymore, i.e. keeping it at > a sub 1.0 release version. > > Thoughts? > Or at least 0.5 or 1.0 alpha. :) I know there are 1000's of hours into the compiler/transpiler/eternc side so having it at 0.0.2 really sucks. I know what Carlos is saying but the damn thing need to just have a release, then release again, and again adding things. This isn't a fashion show where you get one walk down the ile, it's iterative. haha Mike > > Thanks, > Om > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > It’s been too long since the last release, but I think we are at or near > a > > good stopping point for the next release. The default UI looks better, > > you can swap in a theme for many components, the layout subsystem is > > working better, etc. > > > > Is there anything else we “must” put in the next release? I was going to > > put off the rewrite of our handwritten JS to use the JS externs to a > > future release but I am open to waiting until that gets done as it will > > test the externs code we have now. > > > > Thoughts? > > -Alex > > > > >
