> That thread seems to be about Flash Builder compatibility. This is just > Ant stuff, isn't it?
Yes, but it does detail some of the internal logic, logic which may explain why we're seeing the as3 version of UIImpersonator, despite the fact that we're also including the flex version of the swc. > If the answer > is to explicitly list the SWCs, that should be straightforward to do. I suggest that we try to see what happens if we just include the flex version of the swc. My guess is that all the unit tests will pass, suggesting that the right version of UIImpersonator is used, and that no other unit tests were impacted by the change. We can revert at any point if other tests fail, of course. If you think it's a good idea, could you please make the change? That, or let me know what I'd need to edit, because I don't know.
