The workspace for FlexUnit still shows both swcs. Maybe it doesn't clean up old ones? Anyway, I think that's why the last run still didn't pass.
On 12/23/15, 6:17 AM, "Mihai Chira" <mihai.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: >Cool. Instead of specifying the swc, though, I got the flexunit >build.xml to (temporarily) stop compiling the as3 version. This should >achieve the same purpose. (I did this on the develop branch, I guess >that's the one we're using on CI?) > >On 22 December 2015 at 17:06, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 12/22/15, 2:59 AM, "Mihai Chira" <mihai.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >>>> If the answer >>>> is to explicitly list the SWCs, that should be straightforward to do. >>> >>>I suggest that we try to see what happens if we just include the flex >>>version of the swc. My guess is that all the unit tests will pass, >>>suggesting that the right version of UIImpersonator is used, and that >>>no other unit tests were impacted by the change. We can revert at any >>>point if other tests fail, of course. >>>If you think it's a good idea, could you please make the change? That, >>>or let me know what I'd need to edit, because I don't know. >> >> I took a look at the build scripts. In flexunit-tests.xml seems to be >> using a <flexunit> Ant task with a <library> option. I've never used >>that >> before, but I would suggest trying to specify the swc you want instead >>of >> just using the target folder which has both swcs. >> >> -Alex >>
