Internally, it’s always setting it to 0,0. It looks to me like some renderers might be doing some relative positioning, but I did not study them well enough to figure it out.
I think it was in charts, so Peter should probably have a better idea. On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:41 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 7/26/16, 11:47 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I agree there should be a Group object. >> >> The problem is that the way the classes are currently constructed is that >> 100 pixel “Rect" positioned at 100,100 actually contains the following >> markup: <svg x=“100” y=“100"><rect x=“0” y=“0” width=“100” >> height=“100”/></svg> > > Are you saying that code is doing relative positioning re-calculation? I > would wonder why it does that. Otherwise, a more straightforward mapping > would make sense. > > -Alex >
