On 12/16/16, 11:58 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 12/16/16, 11:42 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash >> Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >I think we don't need to decide one way or the other right now. We >>need >> >simple html docs for sure. >> >> I'm not sure what you mean by this. What does "simple html" mean and >>why >> do we need it? >> > >I could be wrong, but I assume IDE's need HTML formatted docs to show >hover >over API documentation? We cant expect a JS engine being available >everywhere. If you are referring to Flash Builder, I don't know for sure, but there is some indication that it just needs the DITA.xml file and not html. I don't know about other IDEs. Josh, have you thought about this for VSCode? > >Also, for SEO we need pre-formatted HTML whichever way you decide to do >it. Are you sure about this? I was under the impression that all RIAs, whether written in Flex or not, had to simply return HTML for some URL. The file didn't actually have to exist statically. IMO, this problem needs to be made easy for all FlexJS applications and that's one reason to make ASDoc a RIA. So we can show folks how to do it. Are there really static pages behind Home Depot and Amazon's stores? -Alex
