On 12/18/16, 5:27 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Google doesn’t index JS applications Is this true? The article Om posted seems to disagree. >I think HTML is best for that usecase. >Displaying help in IDEs ususally works by looking for a file with the >same name and relative path as the class being displayed (but replacing >the file ending with html). These IDEs will not be able to display our >API documentation without updating the IDE. And for one of our major >IDEs, I deffinitely know that hell will freeze first before they come >with an update. This may be true for Java, but for Flex, it appears that both FDT and FB work from the DITA xml files, not from HTML. >You (Alex) have stated several times, that you will favour new Features >over stability and other things. That’s a valid way to see things, but I >have been working for enterprizses fort he last ... gee 17 years and I >know that they like features, but even more they like stability, >reliability, standards etc. That’s why I’m constantly pulling to get/keep >a bit of these ideas in FlexJS. Really what I am saying is that to get to 1.0 fastest, we need a critical mass of features that enables someone to produce a production application, and figure out the usability/approachable of our APIs. So backward-compatibility with last week's APIs is not important and regression testing isn't important until we understand what it takes to make someone(s) successful. I will be much more serious about stability and backward-compatibility after we hit 1.0. -Alex
