+1

2017-01-10 14:09 GMT+00:00 Fréderic Cox <coxfrede...@gmail.com>:

> AMF is also essential for us to take FlexJS serious as a replacement to
> Flex
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Vincent <vinc...@after24.net> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Same points than Christopher : AMF and modules.
> > The first is essential for us.
> >
> > Vincent.
> >
> >
> >
> > Le 10/01/2017 à 13:07, Christofer Dutz a écrit :
> >
> >> +1 for the AMF and +1 for not-unloadable modules.
> >>
> >> I see it the same way as Carlos. At the moment I see FlexJS as an
> >> opportunity for companies to get out of the dilemma of being stuck in a
> >> dead end with their existing Flex applications.
> >> Supporting things like modules and AMF will ease the migration costs
> >> dramatically. Even if AMF might be a touch slower than JSON I still
> think
> >> it’s worth being supported.
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> Am 10.01.17, 12:14 schrieb "carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> >> Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> >> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>:
> >>
> >>      "IMO, this has two halves:  non-unloadable modules is relatively
> >> straight
> >>      forward to do.  Unloadable modules will be a ton of work.  IIRC,
> >> Flex 1.0
> >>      and I think even Flex 2.x grew its customer base without unloadable
> >>      modules."
> >>           If non-unloadable modules is easy to implement, I think it
> >> should go ASAP.
> >>      Then we could left unloadable modules por the future...
> >>           For me, AMF is a must, since many companies are using it, and
> I
> >> expect many
> >>      of them switch from old Flex to FlexJS if it's as easy as change
> >> only the
> >>      frontend. Change server code means no easy way to change, so stick
> >> in old
> >>      code
> >>           Thanks
> >>                     2017-01-08 9:52 GMT+01:00 Harbs <
> >> harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
> >>           > I agree that skinning is harder than it should be.
> >>      >
> >>      > For one thing: There’s too many attributes which are set
> directly.
> >> More
> >>      > extensive use of CSS would make skinning easier.
> >>      >
> >>      > On Jan 8, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Christofer Dutz <
> >> christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >>      > wrote:
> >>      >
> >>      > > From my side I’m missing skinnable components. I really loved
> >> the way I
> >>      > could create applications with skinning.
> >>      >
> >>      >
> >>                --
> >>           Carlos Rovira
> >>      Director General
> >>      M: +34 607 22 60 05
> >>      http://www.codeoscopic.com
> >>      http://www.avant2.es
> >>           Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y
> puede
> >> contener
> >>      información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este
> mensaje
> >> por
> >>      error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta
> misma
> >> vía y
> >>      proceda a su destrucción.
> >>           De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999),
> le
> >> comunicamos
> >>      que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> >> CODEOSCOPIC
> >>      S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación
> del
> >>      servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de
> acceso,
> >>      rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
> >> nuestras
> >>      oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
> >> documentación
> >>      necesaria.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to