I agree that FlexJS Summit is a better name. - Josh
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > Ok gyus … good news, > > So in general we are all set to make our first Flex Summit happen … the > ASF would be happy, if we did it and the LF doesn’t have any objections. > > The procedure would be that we come up with a schedule of 5-6 > Talks/Events. That means we would not be using the official CFP system. > However, if someone was to submit anything Flex related in the CFP this > would be forwarded to us for being taken into consideration. That makes > planning a lot easier as we can discuss the details here and won’t have to > hope for our talks to be selected. > > Also we were asked on what day the summit should be. Tuesday, Wednesday or > Thursday. As I understood Harbs, that it would be better for him to attend > later in the Week I would suggest Thursday, but as probably Justin and I > would be submitting something related to IoT I would do a quick check to > make sure the IoT Summit is not on Thursday ;-) > > The Linux Foundation would like to know if the Summit should be called > “Flex Summit” … I would prefer “FlexJS Summit” to sort of promote that the > summit would have a focus on FlexJS and eventually make people curious, but > I think we should decide here quickly so the LF can get started. > > Also the LF would need a short introduction/summary … I would start > writing such an introduction and post it here for further discussion, if > that’s ok with you? > > Last not least I am currently discussing options with the LF for enabling > Summit Sponsors with a separate pricing, allowing companies to explicitly > sponsor project summits and not the entire ApacheCon. I’ll keep you guys > and hereby potential sponsors updated on that. > > Really excited about this :-) > > Chris > >
