And I got a response from the LF. The IoT summit will be on all three days, so
it won’t really matter which day we have the summit on.
The LF however will have an eye on our schedule to avoid any conflicts.
Chris
Am 31.01.17, 19:34 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
Ok so I just added a confluence page, which we could use to aggregate
several questions.
I also added a short text (even purchased a picture I think would fit
nicely) … please add your names in the “supporter” column, if you support a
given option in the first two parts (name and day selection)
Also feel free to change the text and add things to the schedule,
eventually comment back here, if something needs discussing. I think this
thread should be used for the discussion and the confluence page should be the
current state of the discussion. Making it easier for others so see the current
state.
The schedule still has some blanks that need to be filled. I already added
talks people mentioned in the other thread and one talk I think we should have
somebody do. But it’s just a collection of ideas.
Chris
Am 31.01.17, 17:12 schrieb "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com>:
I agree that FlexJS Summit is a better name.
- Josh
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Christofer Dutz
<christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
wrote:
> Ok gyus … good news,
>
> So in general we are all set to make our first Flex Summit happen …
the
> ASF would be happy, if we did it and the LF doesn’t have any
objections.
>
> The procedure would be that we come up with a schedule of 5-6
> Talks/Events. That means we would not be using the official CFP
system.
> However, if someone was to submit anything Flex related in the CFP
this
> would be forwarded to us for being taken into consideration. That
makes
> planning a lot easier as we can discuss the details here and won’t
have to
> hope for our talks to be selected.
>
> Also we were asked on what day the summit should be. Tuesday,
Wednesday or
> Thursday. As I understood Harbs, that it would be better for him to
attend
> later in the Week I would suggest Thursday, but as probably Justin
and I
> would be submitting something related to IoT I would do a quick check
to
> make sure the IoT Summit is not on Thursday ;-)
>
> The Linux Foundation would like to know if the Summit should be called
> “Flex Summit” … I would prefer “FlexJS Summit” to sort of promote
that the
> summit would have a focus on FlexJS and eventually make people
curious, but
> I think we should decide here quickly so the LF can get started.
>
> Also the LF would need a short introduction/summary … I would start
> writing such an introduction and post it here for further discussion,
if
> that’s ok with you?
>
> Last not least I am currently discussing options with the LF for
enabling
> Summit Sponsors with a separate pricing, allowing companies to
explicitly
> sponsor project summits and not the entire ApacheCon. I’ll keep you
guys
> and hereby potential sponsors updated on that.
>
> Really excited about this :-)
>
> Chris
>
>
