Yes, I'm trying to say that a simpler starter project could be to display the generated JS code side by side with the AS/MXML. And it would do nothing more than that.
I'm not trying to tell you to do this instead of the CodePen/JSFiddle project. I'm saying that this simpler project could benefit your CodePen/JSFiddle project. It has a smaller scope, so you could release something more quickly. Something that potential FlexJS users would find useful too! Both projects will integrate with the compiler, though, so a lot of the code that you'd write for the simpler project could probably be reused in the more complex project. Maybe you'd prefer to jump right into the more complex CodePen/JSFiddle project, and that's totally fine! Just a suggestion. - Josh On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:42 AM, OK <p...@olafkrueger.net> wrote: > Josh Tynjala wrote > > In this simpler project, the generated code wouldn't even be run (maybe > > that's the part that you missed?) > > I think this is the part that I don't understand. Where do you think the > generated code comes from? > I thought if it comes from the compiler it always runs? > > Or is the idea to just prepare some pre-compiled examples and display the > MXML/AS3 and HTML/JS side by side? > > Sorry, I'm lost ;-) > > Thanks, > Olaf > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-flex- > development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-POC-JSFiddle-for- > FlexJS-Compile-as-a-service-tp61369p61388.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
