Josh Tynjala wrote > It has a smaller scope, so you could release > something more quickly. Something that potential FlexJS users would find > useful too! Both projects will integrate with the compiler, though, so a > lot of the code that you'd write for the simpler project could probably be > reused in the more complex project.
I've got it, Josh! :-)) You're definitely right that this would mean to release faster... but I'm so curious how a compiler-as-service would work ;-) Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-POC-JSFiddle-for-FlexJS-Compile-as-a-service-tp61369p61403.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
