Josh, there are new compiler options like js-external-library-path,
js-library-path, swf-library-path, swf-external-library-path.  Does your
VSCode integration handle these?

-Alex

On 5/31/17, 8:42 PM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:

>As I understand it, the compiler should just take care of differences
>between JS and SWF, as long as your targets option is correct. VSCode
>shouldn't need to do anything​ special except to pass in the correct
>options.
>
>There's nothing related to dual changes on my to-do list at this time, but
>maybe I missed something important...
>
>- Josh
>
>On May 31, 2017 7:52 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Josh,
>
>VS Code is now reporting lots of errors in the Problems window. I’m
>guessing it does not know how to differentiate between JS and SWF builds
>using dual?
>
>Is that something on your to-do list?
>
>Thanks,
>Harbs
>
>> On Jun 1, 2017, at 5:10 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Bingo. Thanks!
>>
>> SWF output still gets all kinds of errors, but the JS output is pretty
>error free. I still have some fixing up to do before I can see how well it
>actually works, but at least the compiler is not complaining now.
>>
>>> On Jun 1, 2017, at 4:45 AM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Try replacing the js-output-type compiler option with:
>>>
>>> "targets": ["JSFlex"]
>>>
>>> - Josh
>>>
>>> On May 31, 2017 6:26 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I’m using asconfig in VSCode to compile with these settings:
>>>>   "config": "flex",
>>>>   "compilerOptions": {
>>>>       "debug": false,
>>>>       "js-output-type": "flexjs",
>>>>       "source-map": false,
>>>>       "library-path": [
>>>>           "lib"
>>>>       ],
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 1, 2017, at 1:04 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> HI,
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am I missing something?
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps try <targets>JSFlex</targets> in your pom.xml? I believe the
>>>> name changed from pre to post dual branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Justin
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>

Reply via email to