I have yet to hear a good reason not to default to null either. Why are you fighting this so hard? All of your arguments that I can recall seem to be that Justin's performance claims aren't as big as he says. Is there more that I missed? Because if it's little more than that, then, at the very least, it's good to improve parity between JS and SWF.
- Josh On Jun 24, 2017 11:45 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: Not unless you can demonstrate there’s a good reason to do so. I have yet to see that. > On Jun 24, 2017, at 5:45 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > Are you OK for Objects and Strings to default to null as well?
