Sounds great! Looking forward!

Harbs

> On Jul 7, 2017, at 2:12 AM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Okay, I figured out how to make VSCode switch to JS APIs instead of SWF
> APIs for completion and things. In the next version of the extension, when
> the targets compiler option is specified in asconfig.json, and the first
> value isn't "SWF", the extension will offer JS APIs. That includes giving
> you access to native browser APIs instead of Flash Player APIs. That's
> going to be a really nice change, I think. Thanks for pointing out this
> issue!
> 
> - Josh
> 
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> The js-output-type, library-path and external-library-path options are
>> probably not needed
>> 
>> I would get rid of -js-output-type. I assume that -targets takes
>> precedence, but just to be safe, you shouldn't use both. -js-output-type is
>> necessary for 0.7.0, but switch entirely to -targets with 0.8.0.
>> 
>>> It would be nice to have full support for the new compiler options
>> 
>> html-template, html-output-filename, js-compiler-option,
>> js-external-library-path, js-library-path, swf-external-library-path,
>> swf-library-path, and remove-circulars should all work in the
>> compilerOptions field if you're using the latest vscode-nextgenas 0.4.4 and
>> asconfigc 0.5.1. I just updated asconfigc to support these options last
>> week, and I haven't made an official announcement yet, so you might have
>> missed that one.
>> 
>> I think there may be one or two you'll still need to put into
>> additionalOptions, but you should be able to switch over most of them.
>> 
>>> 1. I’m getting “problems” even for files which are not used in my
>> project and are not open.
>> 
>> This is something I'm aware of in VSCode. The compiler seems to greedily
>> load everything that exists in a source path, even if you don't actually
>> use it. Personally I like this, but even if I were to make it an option
>> somehow, I'm not aware of a way to stop the compiler from working that way
>> either.
>> 
>>> 2. I’m getting lots of errors which are specific to SWF-only output:
>> 
>> I just glanced through the part of VSCode that passes options to the
>> compiler for code intelligence (different from the way that asconfigc runs
>> the compiler to build), and I don't think I'm actually using the value of
>> -targets. It's probably defaulting to SWF. I'll play around with that to
>> see if I can improve things when -targets is specifically JSFlex.
>> 
>>>  a. I’m not getting JS specific classes recognized.
>> 
>> Just to be clear, are you referring to DOM classes like HTMLButtonElement
>> and other browser APIs here? I just want to be sure so that I test the
>> right thing when I make changes.
>> 
>> - Josh
>> 
>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Since updating to “dual”has been reporting lots of errors. When I build,
>>> both the debug and release builds build correctly, but the PROBLEMS window
>>> and the live code hinting report lots of (non) issues. I’m not sure what
>>> the source of the errors are, but here are the details:
>>> 
>>> I’ve tried a few variations of the asconfig file, but here’s what I
>>> currently have:
>>> {
>>>    "config": "flex",
>>>    "compilerOptions": {
>>>        "debug": true,
>>>        "js-output-type": "flexjs",
>>>        "targets": ["JSFlex"],
>>>        "source-map": false,
>>>        "library-path": [
>>>            "lib"
>>>        ],
>>>        "external-library-path": [
>>>        "typedefs"
>>>        ]
>>>    },
>>>    "copySourcePathAssets": true,
>>>    "additionalOptions": "-remove-circulars 
>>> -js-output-optimization=skipAsCoercions
>>> -html-template=src/resources/mdl-js-index-template.html
>>> -js-external-library-path+=typedefs -js-library-path+=lib",
>>>    "files":
>>>    [
>>>        "src/PortedPrintUI.mxml"
>>>    ]
>>> }
>>> 
>>> The js-output-type, library-path and external-library-path options are
>>> probably not needed, but they don’t seem to adversely effect the builds.
>>> (It would be nice to have full support for the new compiler options.)
>>> 
>>> Problems:
>>> 1. I’m getting “problems” even for files which are not used in my project
>>> and are not open.
>>> 2. I’m getting lots of errors which are specific to SWF-only output:
>>>  a. I’m not getting JS specific classes recognized.
>>>  b. I’m getting lots of incompatible overrides (to Flash methods)
>>>  c. I’m getting overriding function not marked for override errors on
>>> functions that are implemented in flash (i.e. public function get
>>> scaleX():Number)
>>>  d. conflicts between variables and Flash getters.
>>>  e. etc...
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Harbs
>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to