Sounds great! Looking forward! Harbs
> On Jul 7, 2017, at 2:12 AM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Okay, I figured out how to make VSCode switch to JS APIs instead of SWF > APIs for completion and things. In the next version of the extension, when > the targets compiler option is specified in asconfig.json, and the first > value isn't "SWF", the extension will offer JS APIs. That includes giving > you access to native browser APIs instead of Flash Player APIs. That's > going to be a really nice change, I think. Thanks for pointing out this > issue! > > - Josh > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> The js-output-type, library-path and external-library-path options are >> probably not needed >> >> I would get rid of -js-output-type. I assume that -targets takes >> precedence, but just to be safe, you shouldn't use both. -js-output-type is >> necessary for 0.7.0, but switch entirely to -targets with 0.8.0. >> >>> It would be nice to have full support for the new compiler options >> >> html-template, html-output-filename, js-compiler-option, >> js-external-library-path, js-library-path, swf-external-library-path, >> swf-library-path, and remove-circulars should all work in the >> compilerOptions field if you're using the latest vscode-nextgenas 0.4.4 and >> asconfigc 0.5.1. I just updated asconfigc to support these options last >> week, and I haven't made an official announcement yet, so you might have >> missed that one. >> >> I think there may be one or two you'll still need to put into >> additionalOptions, but you should be able to switch over most of them. >> >>> 1. I’m getting “problems” even for files which are not used in my >> project and are not open. >> >> This is something I'm aware of in VSCode. The compiler seems to greedily >> load everything that exists in a source path, even if you don't actually >> use it. Personally I like this, but even if I were to make it an option >> somehow, I'm not aware of a way to stop the compiler from working that way >> either. >> >>> 2. I’m getting lots of errors which are specific to SWF-only output: >> >> I just glanced through the part of VSCode that passes options to the >> compiler for code intelligence (different from the way that asconfigc runs >> the compiler to build), and I don't think I'm actually using the value of >> -targets. It's probably defaulting to SWF. I'll play around with that to >> see if I can improve things when -targets is specifically JSFlex. >> >>> a. I’m not getting JS specific classes recognized. >> >> Just to be clear, are you referring to DOM classes like HTMLButtonElement >> and other browser APIs here? I just want to be sure so that I test the >> right thing when I make changes. >> >> - Josh >> >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Since updating to “dual”has been reporting lots of errors. When I build, >>> both the debug and release builds build correctly, but the PROBLEMS window >>> and the live code hinting report lots of (non) issues. I’m not sure what >>> the source of the errors are, but here are the details: >>> >>> I’ve tried a few variations of the asconfig file, but here’s what I >>> currently have: >>> { >>> "config": "flex", >>> "compilerOptions": { >>> "debug": true, >>> "js-output-type": "flexjs", >>> "targets": ["JSFlex"], >>> "source-map": false, >>> "library-path": [ >>> "lib" >>> ], >>> "external-library-path": [ >>> "typedefs" >>> ] >>> }, >>> "copySourcePathAssets": true, >>> "additionalOptions": "-remove-circulars >>> -js-output-optimization=skipAsCoercions >>> -html-template=src/resources/mdl-js-index-template.html >>> -js-external-library-path+=typedefs -js-library-path+=lib", >>> "files": >>> [ >>> "src/PortedPrintUI.mxml" >>> ] >>> } >>> >>> The js-output-type, library-path and external-library-path options are >>> probably not needed, but they don’t seem to adversely effect the builds. >>> (It would be nice to have full support for the new compiler options.) >>> >>> Problems: >>> 1. I’m getting “problems” even for files which are not used in my project >>> and are not open. >>> 2. I’m getting lots of errors which are specific to SWF-only output: >>> a. I’m not getting JS specific classes recognized. >>> b. I’m getting lots of incompatible overrides (to Flash methods) >>> c. I’m getting overriding function not marked for override errors on >>> functions that are implemented in flash (i.e. public function get >>> scaleX():Number) >>> d. conflicts between variables and Flash getters. >>> e. etc... >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Harbs >> >> >>