IMO, it would not preclude a reactjs component set. You can have Cat-X dependencies as long as they are optional. One of the measures of whether a dependency is optional is whether or not a majority of users use that dependency. Just like the CreateJS component set, we can put together a first cut and if it becomes wildly popular then that community would probably take responsibility for the component set and its distribution to customers.
-Alex On 7/17/17, 3:16 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >As Dave said, let’s see how this plays out at Facebook, but it’s >currently not looking too great.[1] > >My understanding is that it would preclude a reactjs component set, but I >could be wrong. > >[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub >.com%2Ffacebook%2Freact%2Fissues%2F10191%23issuecomment-315707719&data=02% >7C01%7C%7C3246fdcb92214d77f08508d4ccfcd826%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dec >ee1%7C0%7C0%7C636358833708383226&sdata=fDF8%2FwsOXbDNWL1qph6qd4o6U2uKFcyyF >fULZDHna%2BE%3D&reserved=0 ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >om%2Ffacebook%2Freact%2Fissues%2F10191%23issuecomment-315707719&data=02%7C >01%7C%7C3246fdcb92214d77f08508d4ccfcd826%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee >1%7C0%7C0%7C636358833708383226&sdata=fDF8%2FwsOXbDNWL1qph6qd4o6U2uKFcyyFfU >LZDHna%2BE%3D&reserved=0> > >> On Jul 17, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> >>wrote: >> >> Does that rule out a reactjs component set (ala createjs)? >> >> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 12:47 PM >> To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: FYI: React appears to be a no-no >> >> No. >> >> I just thought this was newsworthy. >> >>> On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:27 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>>wrote: >>> >>> I"m not following. Do we currently have a required dependency on >>>React? >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 7/16/17, 6:19 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The incompatibility of React’s license is potentially significant for >>>> FlexJS.[1] >>>> >>>> >>>>[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fiss >>>>ues >>>> >>>>.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FLEGAL-319&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4c6a9d8c95534 >>>>e63 >>>> >>>>772208d4cc4d45db%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636358079 >>>>641 >>>> >>>>383681&sdata=Ag6aXVH9z9XDazv6hpTakzzcNA%2BdIUBrCS1sYTLGTho%3D&reserved= >>>>0 >>>> >>>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissue >>>>s.a >>>> >>>>pache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FLEGAL-319&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4c6a9d8c95534e6 >>>>377 >>>> >>>>2208d4cc4d45db%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63635807964 >>>>139 >>>> >>>>3686&sdata=KeNChB38k71gekwa0h%2Fq6P8P3VN%2FbB2TYzICzB%2BosTo%3D&reserve >>>>d=0 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
