Unless we are absolutely sure that everybody will need the code generated by the compiler, having the compiler call a framework function makes it easier for an app developer to make any adjustments to that code. It is easier to monkey-patch a utility function than find-and-replace some sequence of code the compiler has sprinkled throughout the output.
My 2 cents, -Alex On 7/18/17, 11:36 AM, "yishayw" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: >Alex Harui-2 wrote >> By >> calling new utility functions, the developer has control over the >> conversion. > >I don't understand that point. Do you mean an app developer? > > > > >-- >View this message in context: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle >x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FFlexJS-String-match-tp63392p63405.ht >ml&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9ff1088402ef439ca27908d4ce0e97eb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794 >aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636360009448210304&sdata=nprl9yHUtlsTHbIZxeFq2h%2 >FQNWmtimM%2BxAt0kJA8EcA%3D&reserved=0 >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
