I added the utility functions. I think they can be very simple.
> On Jul 19, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Unless we are absolutely sure that everybody will need the code generated
> by the compiler, having the compiler call a framework function makes it
> easier for an app developer to make any adjustments to that code. It is
> easier to monkey-patch a utility function than find-and-replace some
> sequence of code the compiler has sprinkled throughout the output.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 7/18/17, 11:36 AM, "yishayw" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Alex Harui-2 wrote
>>> By
>>> calling new utility functions, the developer has control over the
>>> conversion.
>>
>> I don't understand that point. Do you mean an app developer?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle
>> x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FFlexJS-String-match-tp63392p63405.ht
>> ml&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9ff1088402ef439ca27908d4ce0e97eb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794
>> aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636360009448210304&sdata=nprl9yHUtlsTHbIZxeFq2h%2
>> FQNWmtimM%2BxAt0kJA8EcA%3D&reserved=0
>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
