Hi Om, I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards FlexJS. If we want to go that way then we need a preference ranking and more complicated VOTE counting.
Regards, Dave > On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We could always structure the VOTE like this: > > 1. Royale > 2. XXX > 3. YYY > 4. FlexJS > > One vote should answer both questions. > > Thanks, > Om > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not change the >> name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help with >> porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed name... >> >> Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name still with >> nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at least one >> day more before VOTE. >> >> Piotr >> >> >> >> 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: >> >>> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change. >>> >>> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to build new >>> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can always >> state >>> from where we have come and what was our story. >>> >>> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" as the >>> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use it since >>> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Piotr >>> >>> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>: >>> >>>> Hi - >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. >>>>> >>>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, that’s >>>> value I can recognize. >>>>> >>>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be involved >>>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around the name. >>>>> >>>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do >> about >>>> mine. >>>>> >>>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t want to >>>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new name can >> we >>>> try and pick one quickly? >>>> >>>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning. >>>> >>>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the result then >>>> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Harbs >>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < >>>> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really important >>>> for >>>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. >>>>>> >>>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is >>>> important in >>>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we don't >>>> get a >>>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we >>>> explain >>>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our time, >>>> since >>>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS projects, and >>>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other >> than >>>> JS!! >>>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible). >>>>>> >>>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name for >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Piotr Zarzycki >>> >>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> >>> skype: zarzycki10 >>> >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki >>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> mobile: +48 880 859 557 >> skype: zarzycki10 >> >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki >> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
