+1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change. I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to build new brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can always state from where we have come and what was our story.
I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" as the most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use it since it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? Thanks, Piotr 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>: > Hi - > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. > > > > If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, that’s > value I can recognize. > > > > The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be involved > in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around the name. > > > > Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do about > mine. > > > > A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t want to > delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new name can we > try and pick one quickly? > > Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning. > > In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the result then we > can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. > > Regards, > Dave > > > > > > Harbs > > > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < > carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really important for > >> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. > >> > >> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is important > in > >> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we don't get > a > >> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we > explain > >> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our time, > since > >> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS projects, and > >> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other than > JS!! > >> (If we want in future years to make it possible). > >> > >> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name for > > -- Piotr Zarzycki mobile: +48 880 859 557 skype: zarzycki10 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
