It may not be the same bits. I think it would be two different packages. There might be different defaults, there is no need for Flash Builder support in the product that isn't called FlexJS so we may not ship those files or mention Flash Builder in the doc.
-Alex On 9/14/17, 11:01 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >So same product but marketed with two different names? > >Kind of odd, but an interesting approach. It might have merit. > >I’d like to sit on this idea. I’m not yet sure how I feel about it. > >Harbs > >> On Sep 15, 2017, at 3:04 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>wrote: >> >> This is why I proposed what I did last night: >> -Project name: Royale >> -Product name for folks who don't know Flex: Royale >> -Product name for folks who do know Flex: FlexJS >
