Dave says, and I agree, that if there is more than one candidate, we might need to use a more complicated voting system like STeVe. What other suggestions do you think have been popular enough to make a second candidate? I think FlexJS has been rejected as the project name.
If anyone wants to push for a name other than Royale, please reply to this post with that name. Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe or not. Thanks, -Alex On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki ><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting vote >> YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his own >> name idea and others can give him +1. >> > >There were several suggestions, some of which we could consider. We >should >probably let the FlexJS yes/no settle down before we start another thread. >All this feels a bit rushed, I am having a bit of a hard time following >discussions/decisions. > >Thanks, >Om > > >> >> Piotr >> >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:39 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > As Alex said I also didn't answer for any single email from someone >>who >> > would like to start from scratch app or even would be new Flex world. >> > >> > We may get such people in the future, but we need to go with path >>where >> > first target will be ports the old one applications. >> > >> > As for the bad press - 4 years ago I have started work in a company >>as an >> > Flex Developer. This company grows on Flex development. Currently they >> > change the direction as many others, but I have to say that anyone >>from >> > initial 20 people said anything wrong about Flex. Just the opposite >>there >> > were very good press out there in the company as in outside in Cracow. >> > >> > I'm all for having product FlexJS. We cannot abandon such tremendous >> > opportunity. Look in the message from Rui in the VOTE thread - This is >> what >> > we need to provide in order to read next time. I've choose FlexJS for >>the >> > port, cause it provides me what I need. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Piotr >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:09 Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> >> > have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target >>called >> >> > "Dover". >> >> > >> >> >> >> Are you testing the non-native speakers? >> >> >> >> I spilt some of my coffee over that one ;-) >> >> >> >> EdB >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> >> I. >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&data >>=02%7C01%7C%7C4127f1b06d7f43f4310808d4fc59ca2f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 >>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636410909953528643&sdata=BTLJuY5ffdBpl7z%2B%2FPa%2FHfu >>ogqLc38DybDD2qL8oF78%3D&reserved=0 >> >> >> > >>
