Hi Harbs, Nice idea. It allows picking up for anyone couple of options.
Piotr On Sat, Sep 16, 2017, 21:57 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > I’m not sure why, but Royale does not resonate very well with me. > > Bend Bead and Strand are all good names as far as I’m concerned. > > I personally like Limber/Limbre. > > I like Boinga in a different way. > > I think that Böja has a great ring to it. > > One way I was thinking about a vote was by allowing everyone to pick up to > three options. Option 1 would count for 3 points, option 2 for 2 and option > 3 for 1. > > We could then tally up the points for the winners. > > At that point we could either pick the one with the most points or call > another vote to decide between the two with the most points. > > Thoughts? > Harbs > > > On Sep 15, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > wrote: > > > > Dave says, and I agree, that if there is more than one candidate, we > might > > need to use a more complicated voting system like STeVe. What other > > suggestions do you think have been popular enough to make a second > > candidate? I think FlexJS has been rejected as the project name. > > > > If anyone wants to push for a name other than Royale, please reply to > this > > post with that name. Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe or > > not. > > > > Thanks, > > -Alex > > > > On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" > > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki > >> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting vote > >>> YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his > own > >>> name idea and others can give him +1. > >>> > >> > >> There were several suggestions, some of which we could consider. We > >> should > >> probably let the FlexJS yes/no settle down before we start another > thread. > >> All this feels a bit rushed, I am having a bit of a hard time following > >> discussions/decisions. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Om > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Piotr > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:39 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> As Alex said I also didn't answer for any single email from someone > >>> who > >>>> would like to start from scratch app or even would be new Flex world. > >>>> > >>>> We may get such people in the future, but we need to go with path > >>> where > >>>> first target will be ports the old one applications. > >>>> > >>>> As for the bad press - 4 years ago I have started work in a company > >>> as an > >>>> Flex Developer. This company grows on Flex development. Currently they > >>>> change the direction as many others, but I have to say that anyone > >>> from > >>>> initial 20 people said anything wrong about Flex. Just the opposite > >>> there > >>>> were very good press out there in the company as in outside in Cracow. > >>>> > >>>> I'm all for having product FlexJS. We cannot abandon such tremendous > >>>> opportunity. Look in the message from Rui in the VOTE thread - This is > >>> what > >>>> we need to provide in order to read next time. I've choose FlexJS for > >>> the > >>>> port, cause it provides me what I need. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Piotr > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:09 Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target > >>> called > >>>>>> "Dover". > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Are you testing the non-native speakers? > >>>>> > >>>>> I spilt some of my coffee over that one ;-) > >>>>> > >>>>> EdB > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Ix Multimedia Software > >>>>> > >>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht > >>>>> > >>>>> T. 06-51952295 > >>>>> I. > >>> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&data > >>> > =02%7C01%7C%7C4127f1b06d7f43f4310808d4fc59ca2f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 > >>> > 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636410909953528643&sdata=BTLJuY5ffdBpl7z%2B%2FPa%2FHfu > >>> ogqLc38DybDD2qL8oF78%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > > > >
