I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time. Thanks, Piotr
2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > Justin voted. > > Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points. > Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9. > > Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes. > Limber on 6 out of 12. > > Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3. Royale and Beads have > 2. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >Piotr changed his vote. > > > >It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13. > >Arise is now third at 9 points. Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8. > > > >Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. > > > >Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren't > >concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with > >Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks. > > > >-Alex > > > >On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > >>Dave changed his abstention to a vote. > >> > >>That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each. Beads now has 11. > >> > >>Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. > >>Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times. > >> > >>-Alex > >> > >>On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >> > >>>Erik changed his vote. That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs > >>>12. > >>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult > >>>site. Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes. > >>> > >>>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now. Boja and Royale have been > >>>mentioned > >>>5 times, Beads 4 times. > >>> > >>>-Alex > >>> > >>>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >>> > >>>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail. > >>>>I > >>>>changed it again. > >>>> > >>>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can > >>>>move Bend enough to make a difference. You could actually increase the > >>>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja. > >>>> > >>>>-Alex > >>>> > >>>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-( > >>>>> > >>>>>EdB > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> > >>>>>wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went > >>>>>>before > >>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can > >>>>>>break > >>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes, > >>>>>>right?) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> EdB > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui > >>>>>><aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> What a dilemma! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions. I haven't voted yet. I > >>>>>>>wanted > >>>>>>>to > >>>>>>> see what the trend was first. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third, > >>>>>>>Royale > >>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely: Bead, Boja and Limber have > >>>>>>>10. > >>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 > >>>>>>>of > >>>>>>>those > >>>>>>> are third place votes. Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5 > >>>>>>>times, > >>>>>>> Beads 4 times. Beads has the most first place votes (3). Royale, > >>>>>>>Limber > >>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner. It will depend on > >>>>>>>how > >>>>>>> you count the votes. And we can't default back to FlexJS either > >>>>>>>given > >>>>>>>the > >>>>>>> other vote. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with > >>>>>>>low-quality > >>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major > >>>>>>>hindrance? > >>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is > >>>>>>>already > >>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework. Does anybody see that as a > >>>>>>>show > >>>>>>> stopper? I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their > >>>>>>> opinion. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name > >>>>>>>is > >>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber? After reading > >>>>>>>this > >>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber. The spell checker > >>>>>>>redirect > >>>>>>> issue is worrisome. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thoughts? > >>>>>>> -Alex > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fgit > >>>>>>>h > >>>>>>>u > >>>>>>>b > >>>>>>>. > >>>>>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C% > 7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08 > >>>>>>>d > >>>>>>>4 > >>>>>>>f > >>>>>>>f > >>>>>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > 7C6364143732119862 > >>>>>>>8 > >>>>>>>8 > >>>>>>>& > >>>>>>>s > >>>>>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > >>>>>>> Muppirala" > >>>>>>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >Abstain (binding) > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> > >>>>>>>wrote: > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> >> I am abstaining for now. > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki > >>>>>>> >><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> >> wrote: > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > Hi, > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for > >>>>>>>fork > >>>>>>>of > >>>>>>> >>FlexJS > >>>>>>> >> > project. > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > LIST: > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > Royale > >>>>>>> >> > Boja > >>>>>>> >> > Strand > >>>>>>> >> > Bead > >>>>>>> >> > Limber > >>>>>>> >> > Boinga > >>>>>>> >> > Braid > >>>>>>> >> > Arise > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE: > >>>>>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most > >>>>>>> favorite > >>>>>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you > >>>>>>>have > >>>>>>> >>choose > >>>>>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can > >>>>>>>follow > >>>>>>>it > >>>>>>> >>in > >>>>>>> >> > their lists > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > EXAMPLE: > >>>>>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points > >>>>>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points > >>>>>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > WINNER: > >>>>>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the > >>>>>>>name. > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > Thanks, > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > Piotr > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht > >>>>>> > >>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295> > >>>>>> I. > >>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > www.ixsoftware.nl& > >>>>>>d > >>>>>>a > >>>>>>t > >>>>>>a > >>>>>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80 > 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae > >>>>>>d > >>>>>>2 > >>>>>>c > >>>>>>1 > >>>>>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata= > Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu > >>>>>>% > >>>>>>2 > >>>>>>B > >>>>>>U > >>>>>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>-- > >>>>>Ix Multimedia Software > >>>>> > >>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >>>>>3521 VB Utrecht > >>>>> > >>>>>T. 06-51952295 > >>>>>I. > >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > www.ixsoftware.nl&d > >>>>>a > >>>>>t > >>>>>a > >>>>>= > >>>>>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80 > 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2 > >>>>>c > >>>>>1 > >>>>>7 > >>>>>8 > >>>>>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata= > Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B > >>>>>U > >>>>>t > >>>>>f > >>>>>l > >>>>>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0 > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > -- Piotr Zarzycki mobile: +48 880 859 557 skype: zarzycki10 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
