I'm sorry I meant 09/20/2017. 2017-09-19 23:51 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>:
> I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> Justin voted. >> >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points. >> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9. >> >> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes. >> Limber on 6 out of 12. >> >> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3. Royale and Beads have >> 2. >> >> Thanks, >> -Alex >> >> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> >Piotr changed his vote. >> > >> >It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13. >> >Arise is now third at 9 points. Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8. >> > >> >Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. >> > >> >Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they >> aren't >> >concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with >> >Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks. >> > >> >-Alex >> > >> >On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> > >> >>Dave changed his abstention to a vote. >> >> >> >>That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each. Beads now has 11. >> >> >> >>Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. >> >>Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times. >> >> >> >>-Alex >> >> >> >>On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> >> >>>Erik changed his vote. That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs >> >>>12. >> >>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult >> >>>site. Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes. >> >>> >> >>>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now. Boja and Royale have been >> >>>mentioned >> >>>5 times, Beads 4 times. >> >>> >> >>>-Alex >> >>> >> >>>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail. >> >>>>I >> >>>>changed it again. >> >>>> >> >>>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone >> can >> >>>>move Bend enough to make a difference. You could actually increase >> the >> >>>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja. >> >>>> >> >>>>-Alex >> >>>> >> >>>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-( >> >>>>> >> >>>>>EdB >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >> >>>>>wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went >> >>>>>>before >> >>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I >> can >> >>>>>>break >> >>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes, >> >>>>>>right?) >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> EdB >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui >> >>>>>><aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> What a dilemma! >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions. I haven't voted yet. I >> >>>>>>>wanted >> >>>>>>>to >> >>>>>>> see what the trend was first. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to >> third, >> >>>>>>>Royale >> >>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely: Bead, Boja and Limber have >> >>>>>>>10. >> >>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 >> >>>>>>>of >> >>>>>>>those >> >>>>>>> are third place votes. Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5 >> >>>>>>>times, >> >>>>>>> Beads 4 times. Beads has the most first place votes (3). Royale, >> >>>>>>>Limber >> >>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner. It will depend >> on >> >>>>>>>how >> >>>>>>> you count the votes. And we can't default back to FlexJS either >> >>>>>>>given >> >>>>>>>the >> >>>>>>> other vote. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with >> >>>>>>>low-quality >> >>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major >> >>>>>>>hindrance? >> >>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is >> >>>>>>>already >> >>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework. Does anybody see that as a >> >>>>>>>show >> >>>>>>> stopper? I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get >> their >> >>>>>>> opinion. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name >> >>>>>>>is >> >>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)? >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber? After reading >> >>>>>>>this >> >>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber. The spell checker >> >>>>>>>redirect >> >>>>>>> issue is worrisome. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Thoughts? >> >>>>>>> -Alex >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> [1] >> >>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=ht >> tps%3A%2F%2Fgit >> >>>>>>>h >> >>>>>>>u >> >>>>>>>b >> >>>>>>>. >> >>>>>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144b >> d1c1e428f8fed08 >> >>>>>>>d >> >>>>>>>4 >> >>>>>>>f >> >>>>>>>f >> >>>>>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6 >> 364143732119862 >> >>>>>>>8 >> >>>>>>>8 >> >>>>>>>& >> >>>>>>>s >> >>>>>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash >> >>>>>>> Muppirala" >> >>>>>>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >Abstain (binding) >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> >> >>>>>>>wrote: >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> >> I am abstaining for now. >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki >> >>>>>>> >><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>> >> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > Hi, >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for >> >>>>>>>fork >> >>>>>>>of >> >>>>>>> >>FlexJS >> >>>>>>> >> > project. >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > LIST: >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > Royale >> >>>>>>> >> > Boja >> >>>>>>> >> > Strand >> >>>>>>> >> > Bead >> >>>>>>> >> > Limber >> >>>>>>> >> > Boinga >> >>>>>>> >> > Braid >> >>>>>>> >> > Arise >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE: >> >>>>>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most >> >>>>>>> favorite >> >>>>>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you >> >>>>>>>have >> >>>>>>> >>choose >> >>>>>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can >> >>>>>>>follow >> >>>>>>>it >> >>>>>>> >>in >> >>>>>>> >> > their lists >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > EXAMPLE: >> >>>>>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points >> >>>>>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points >> >>>>>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > WINNER: >> >>>>>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the >> >>>>>>>name. >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > Thanks, >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > Piotr >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> -- >> >>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295> >> >>>>>> I. >> >>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www >> .ixsoftware.nl& >> >>>>>>d >> >>>>>>a >> >>>>>>t >> >>>>>>a >> >>>>>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8% >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae >> >>>>>>d >> >>>>>>2 >> >>>>>>c >> >>>>>>1 >> >>>>>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7% >> 2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu >> >>>>>>% >> >>>>>>2 >> >>>>>>B >> >>>>>>U >> >>>>>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>-- >> >>>>>Ix Multimedia Software >> >>>>> >> >>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >>>>>3521 VB Utrecht >> >>>>> >> >>>>>T. 06-51952295 >> >>>>>I. >> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www. >> ixsoftware.nl&d >> >>>>>a >> >>>>>t >> >>>>>a >> >>>>>= >> >>>>>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8% >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2 >> >>>>>c >> >>>>>1 >> >>>>>7 >> >>>>>8 >> >>>>>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7% >> 2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B >> >>>>>U >> >>>>>t >> >>>>>f >> >>>>>l >> >>>>>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> > skype: zarzycki10 > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > -- Piotr Zarzycki mobile: +48 880 859 557 skype: zarzycki10 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
