Hi Justin, I've asked Adobe Legal similar questions in the past. Adobe Legal will say it is fine because it is related to Flex and was already out there with a open source license, and even better, an Apache license. It would be bit trickier if it wasn't already ALv2, and much harder/impossible if it didn't already have an OS license. I suppose I could go bug some higher up to nod in agreement, but they have every time so far. Maybe if someone files a suit against Apache I'll go do that.
Adobe is happy to share code. I'm happy to share code. I'm sorry you are not happy and feel you must attack me for pointing out an error in your assessment of the situation. I just want our users to be able to safely use our code and install Flex with fewer problems. -Alex On 4/19/18, 2:47 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >So Alex as an Adobe employee you're happy that someone took Adobe >licensed code (assuming that is the case) that wasn’t part of a grant to >the ASF and added it to the code base with ASF headers? What do you think >Adobe legal might say about this? No need to ask them I just asking you >think what they might say. I’m guessing they may have a small issue with >that. > >Thanks, >Justin
