I've published the announcement:
http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/06/24/announcing-apache-flink-0.9.0-release.html

Let me know if anything is not right. Otherwise, please spread the word!

Cheers,
Max

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for your feedback. We managed to improve the initial document quite
> a bit. The thing about the known issues is that it might give a false
> impression to people reading the release announcement because the real
> issues we are working on, can hardly be summarized by a couple of JIRA
> issues. Of course we will fix those JIRA issues (and I made sure this is
> reflected in JIRA) but the right place for keeping track of them IMHO is
> not the release announcement. With that in mind, I have removed the known
> issues section.
>
> I'm converting the document to markdown now to publish it. The website is
> already set up for the 0.9.0.
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thank you Max for the nice document!
>> Can we please add FLINK-2271 to the list of known issues?
>>
>> -Vasia.
>>
>> On 24 June 2015 at 13:08, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > I like the announcement now.
>> >
>> > Would like to add a note to Gelly and Flink ML that these are early
>> > versions of the libraries, that they are subject to changes and not yet
>> > performance optimized.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance.
>> > >
>> > > I think the release announcement needs to be about the core
>> > > points/improvements, rather than have many exact details. We post a
>> link
>> > > for details for those interested in the details.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
>> aljos...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of *recovery".
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are
>> > >> published
>> > >> > on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release
>> > >> > announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final pass
>> > and
>> > >> > publish the announcement.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <
>> > rmetz...@apache.org>
>> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > I would add a separate paragraph about it!
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <
>> twal...@apache.org
>> > >
>> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > > Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a
>> paragraph
>> > >> about
>> > >> > > it
>> > >> > > > > or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes"
>> > section?
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a
>> bit
>> > >> > > > >> differently,
>> > >> > > > >> updating it.
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <
>> > >> m...@apache.org
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > >> wrote:
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>  Hi everyone,
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the
>> > >> release
>> > >> > > > >>> announcement. I've created a document which basically
>> contains
>> > >> the
>> > >> > > > >>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>> Best,
>> > >> > > > >>> Max
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to