We should ping the Zeppelin guys to update their Flink dependency. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm so happy we have pushed it out :) It took a while but I think we can be > very pleased with the result. > > I will post an announcement to the user/dev and the Apache announce mailing > list. > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Chiwan Park <chiwanp...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Great! We should post the announcement mail to user mailing list :) > > > > Regards, > > Chiwan Park > > > > > On Jun 24, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Great that this release is out, finally :-) > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >> I've published the announcement: > > >> > > >> > > > http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/06/24/announcing-apache-flink-0.9.0-release.html > > >> > > >> Let me know if anything is not right. Otherwise, please spread the > word! > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Max > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Thanks for your feedback. We managed to improve the initial document > > >> quite > > >>> a bit. The thing about the known issues is that it might give a false > > >>> impression to people reading the release announcement because the > real > > >>> issues we are working on, can hardly be summarized by a couple of > JIRA > > >>> issues. Of course we will fix those JIRA issues (and I made sure this > > is > > >>> reflected in JIRA) but the right place for keeping track of them IMHO > > is > > >>> not the release announcement. With that in mind, I have removed the > > known > > >>> issues section. > > >>> > > >>> I'm converting the document to markdown now to publish it. The > website > > is > > >>> already set up for the 0.9.0. > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < > > >>> vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> thank you Max for the nice document! > > >>>> Can we please add FLINK-2271 to the list of known issues? > > >>>> > > >>>> -Vasia. > > >>>> > > >>>> On 24 June 2015 at 13:08, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> I like the announcement now. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Would like to add a note to Gelly and Flink ML that these are early > > >>>>> versions of the libraries, that they are subject to changes and not > > >> yet > > >>>>> performance optimized. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I think the release announcement needs to be about the core > > >>>>>> points/improvements, rather than have many exact details. We post > a > > >>>> link > > >>>>>> for details for those interested in the details. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > >>>> aljos...@apache.org> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of > > >> *recovery". > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts > are > > >>>>>>> published > > >>>>>>>> on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release > > >>>>>>>> announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final > > >> pass > > >>>>> and > > >>>>>>>> publish the announcement. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I also like a separate paragraph about it :-) > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger < > > >>>>> rmetz...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I would add a separate paragraph about it! > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther < > > >>>> twal...@apache.org > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a > > >>>> paragraph > > >>>>>>> about > > >>>>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>>>> or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes" > > >>>>> section? > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a > > >>>> bit > > >>>>>>>>>>>> differently, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> updating it. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels < > > >>>>>>> m...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the > > >>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement. I've created a document which basically > > >>>> contains > > >>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> milestone release announcement with a few changes. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Max > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > >
