If not API breaking before 1.0, then probably never? On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> I was also thinking of deprecating that. With that, RichFunctions should > change "open(Configuration)" --> "open()". > > Would be heavily API breaking, so bit hesitant there... > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Thanks for the hint Matthias. > > So actually the parameter of the open() method is useless? IMHO that does > > not look like a nice API design... > > We should try to keep DataSet and DataStream API in sync. > > Does it make sense to deprecate withParameters() for 1.0? > > > > Timo > > > > > > On 24.11.2015 14:31, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > > >> We had this discussion a while ago. > >> > >> If I recall correctly, "withParameters()" is not encourage to be used in > >> DataSet either. > >> > >> This is the thread: > >> > >> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-dev/201509.mbox/%3C55EC69CD.1070003%40apache.org%3E > >> > >> -Matthias > >> > >> On 11/24/2015 02:14 PM, Timo Walther wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I want to set the Configuration of a streaming operator and access it > >>> via the open method of the RichFunction. > >>> There is no possibility to set the Configuration of the open method at > >>> the moment, right? Can I open an issue for a withParameters() > equivalent > >>> for the Stremaing API? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Timo > >>> > >>> > > >
