should we do the same for IOFormats to be consistent? after FLINK-2351
they aren't used by our formats.
On 24.11.2015 15:17, Suneel Marthi wrote:
Agree with @till +1 to change this now
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
If not API breaking before 1.0, then probably never?
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
I was also thinking of deprecating that. With that, RichFunctions should
change "open(Configuration)" --> "open()".
Would be heavily API breaking, so bit hesitant there...
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org>
wrote:
Thanks for the hint Matthias.
So actually the parameter of the open() method is useless? IMHO that
does
not look like a nice API design...
We should try to keep DataSet and DataStream API in sync.
Does it make sense to deprecate withParameters() for 1.0?
Timo
On 24.11.2015 14:31, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
We had this discussion a while ago.
If I recall correctly, "withParameters()" is not encourage to be used
in
DataSet either.
This is the thread:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-dev/201509.mbox/%3C55EC69CD.1070003%40apache.org%3E
-Matthias
On 11/24/2015 02:14 PM, Timo Walther wrote:
Hi all,
I want to set the Configuration of a streaming operator and access it
via the open method of the RichFunction.
There is no possibility to set the Configuration of the open method
at
the moment, right? Can I open an issue for a withParameters()
equivalent
for the Stremaing API?
Regards,
Timo
