@Greg

I think that would be amazing. It does require a bit of cleanup, though. As
far as I know, the Hadoop dependency is additionally used for some Kerberos
utilities and for its S3 file system implementation.
We would need to make the Kerberos part Hadoop independent and the
FileSystem loading dynamic (with a good exception that the Hadoop
dependency should be added if the filesystem cannot be loaded).

Stephan


On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com> wrote:

> Okay, this sounds prudent. Would this be the right time to implement
> FLINK-2268 "Provide Flink binary release without Hadoop"?
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 for dropping Hadoop1 support
> >
> > @greg There is quite some complexity in the build setup and release
> scripts
> > and testing to support Hadoop 1. Also, we have to prepare to add support
> > for Hadoop 3, and then supporting in addition Hadoop 1 seems very tough.
> >
> > Stephan
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Robert,
> > >
> > > What are the benefits to Flink for dropping Hadoop 1 support? Is there
> > > significant code cleanup or would we simply be publishing one less set
> of
> > > artifacts?
> > >
> > > Greg
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The Apache Hadoop community has recently released the first alpha
> > version
> > > > for Hadoop 3.0.0, while we are still supporting Hadoop 1. I think its
> > > time
> > > > to finally drop Hadoop 1 support in Flink.
> > > >
> > > > The last minor Hadoop 1 release was in 27 June, 2014.
> > > > Apache Spark dropped Hadoop 1 support with their 2.0 release in July
> > > 2016.
> > > > Hadoop 2.2 was first released in October 2013, so there was enough
> time
> > > > for users to upgrade.
> > > >
> > > > I added also the user@ list to the discussion to get opinions about
> > this
> > > > from there as well.
> > > >
> > > > Let me know what you think about this!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Robert
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to