Hi to all, for the 1.2 release do you think it will be possible to include also a PR to implement FLINK-4491 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4491>? The PR is waiting for a review at https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2790.
Best, Flavio On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jark, > > FLINK-4469: I agree, UDTFs would be a great feature. I don't think we > should make it a blocker but I will help to get it the master before the > feature freeze. > FLINK-4704: Regarding the renaming of the namespace, we have two positive > votes in JIRA, but we should also start a discussion on the dev and user > list to collect some more input. The actual change should be simple. > > @Everybody: I created a wiki page for the 1.2 release [1] and added all > features discussed in this thread so far. > Please have a look at the page and update it if you know the JIRAs and/or > state of the features. > > Cheers, Fabian > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/1.2+Release > > 2016-10-28 15:28 GMT+02:00 Kostas Kloudas <k.klou...@data-artisans.com>: > > > Hello, > > > > As Aljoshca said, the TriggerDSL depends on another PR, before it can be > > merged. > > In addition, this will change also the whole structure of how we test > > window/trigger > > related functionality, so some refactoring will be required. > > > > Kostas > > > > > On Oct 28, 2016, at 3:06 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > @Till: For the TriggerDSL we have to merge my open PR [1] for > refactoring > > > the WindowOperator/Trigger tests and then refactor the tests of the > > > TriggerDSL to use the new test facilities introduced there. Plus then > > maybe > > > some fixups. > > > > > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 at 11:17 Jark Wu <wuchong...@alibaba-inc.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 to the schedule > > >> > > >> I hope to add > > >> > > >> 1) Table API: User defined table function (FLINK-4469 < > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4469>) > > >> 2) Table API: Move Table API to org.apache.flink.table (FLINK-4704 < > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4704>) > > >> > > >> The 1) has been discussed for a long time and a pull request has been > on > > >> github. The 2) would be a large change, but I hope it could be > included > > in > > >> 1.2 release, otherwise it will be more difficult to fix it. > > >> > > >> - Jark Wu > > >> > > >>> 在 2016年10月26日，下午8:09，Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 写道： > > >>> > > >>> +1 for the features to include. > > >>> > > >>> What is the state of the Trigger DSL? How much is left to be done > > before > > >>> merging? > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> Till > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > aljos...@apache.org > > > > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1 the schedule proposed so far. > > >>>> > > >>>> Do we also want to get in the "Trigger DSL" that we've had brewing > > for a > > >>>> while now? > > >>>> > > >>>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 at 16:17 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> I think this sounds very reasonable, +1 to the schedule. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I would definitely add > > >>>>> - FLIP-10 (unify checkpoints and savepoints) > > >>>>> - FLIP-7 (metrics in web UI) > > >>>>> - FLIP-12 (async request operators) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Those should be all safe bets, as they are basically done. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Let's see what else is in shape until the feature freeze day. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi everybody, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Flink 1.1.0 was released in August and I think it is time to kick > > off > > >> a > > >>>>>> discussion about the schedule and scope of Flink 1.2.0. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> == Scope > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> We started to collect features for Flink 1.2.0 in the Flink > Release > > >>>> wiki > > >>>>>> page [1]. > > >>>>>> I copy the feature list for convenience: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - Dynamic Scaling / Key Groups (FLINK-3755 > > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3755>) (Design Doc > > >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G1OS1z3xEBOrYD4wSu- > > >>>>>> LuBCyPUWyFd9l3T9WyssQ63w/edit#heading=h.2suhu1fjxmp4> > > >>>>>> ) > > >>>>>> - Rescalable Non-Partitioned State (FLIP-8 > > >>>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP- > > >>>>>> 8%3A+Rescalable+Non-Partitioned+State> > > >>>>>> ) > > >>>>>> - Backwards compatible savepoints (FLINK-4797 > > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4797>) > > >>>>>> - > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Integrate Flink with Apache Mesos (FLINK-1984 > > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1984>) (Design Doc > > >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > 1WItafBmGbjlaBbP8Of5PAFOH9GUJQ > > >>>>>> xf5S4hjEuPchuU/edit#heading=h.33uxp8abvuf0> > > >>>>>> ) > > >>>>>> - Secure Data Access (FLINK-3930 > > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3930>) (Design Doc > > >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1- > > >>>> GQB6uVOyoaXGwtqwqLV8BHDxWiMO2W > > >>>>>> nVzBoJ8oPaAs/edit#heading=h.dr22iualfm0h> > > >>>>>> ) > > >>>>>> - Queryable State (FLINK-3779 > > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3779>) > > >>>>>> - Metrics in Webinterface (FLIP-7 > > >>>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP- > > >>>>>> 7%3A+Expose+metrics+to+WebInterface> > > >>>>>> ) > > >>>>>> - Kafka 0.10 support (FLINK-4035 > > >>>>>> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4035>) > > >>>>>> - Table API: Group Window Aggregates (FLINK-4691, FLIP-11) > > >>>>>> - Table API: Scalar Functions (FLINK-3097) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Is a feature missing or something too ambitious? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> == Schedule > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> In my opinion we should try to release 1.2.0 before Christmas. > That > > >>>>> means, > > >>>>>> we should have a RC1 by end November / early December and a > feature > > >>>>> freeze > > >>>>>> two weeks earlier in mid of November. Does that sound appropriate > or > > >>>>> should > > >>>>>> we aim for an earlier or later release? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> What do others think about the scope and schedule? > > >>>>>> Please discuss. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>> Fabian > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/ > > >>>>>> Flink+Release+and+Feature+Plan > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
