Please go ahead +1 Thank you for taking care!
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > On 22. Aug 2017, at 18:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Quick update: If there are no objections, I will start looking into > >> how to stop serving the docs for Flink < 1.0 after tomorrow. > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> Thanks for your early feedback Kostas and Ted. > >>> > >>> @Kostas: I have a proposal for a more obvious warning here: > >>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4553 Would appreciate comments in > >>> that PR too :-) > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Without any upgrade path, the old versions are not useful. > >>>> > >>>> +1 on redirecting doc to stable release(s). > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Kostas Kloudas < > >> k.klou...@data-artisans.com > >>>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Ufuk, > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> I think that this is a nice change! > >>>>> Thanks Ufuk for opening the discussion. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think that broken/redirect links are not an issue, > >>>>> as either way the information provided is far outdated > >>>>> (== wrong). > >>>>> > >>>>> As for the warning, we cannot put it in the header instead > >>>>> of the footer? Sth like, this page may contain outdated info, > >>>>> please refer to XXX for an updated version. > >>>>> > >>>>> Kostas > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Aug 16, 2017, at 6:02 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hey devs, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I would like to stop serving the documentation for all Flink > versions > >>>>>> prior to 1.0. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do you have any concerns about this? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> These Flink versions are very old without any upgrade path to newer > >>>>>> versions but they still get a lot of traffic and most new users > don't > >>>>>> realize that they are looking at a very outdated docs page. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Even with a stronger warning about being outdated, I don't see a > >> point > >>>>>> in serving them. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If we choose to do this, I would redirect these ancient pages to the > >>>>>> docs of the latest stable release and update the release process > Wiki > >>>>>> page to update those redirects etc. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This will mean that some links in old StackOverflow questions and > the > >>>>>> mailing list archives will be broken/redirected. If you have > concerns > >>>>>> about this, please raise your voice in this thread. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> – Ufuk > >>>>>> > >>>>>> PS: I've created an issue to improve the visibility of the outdated > >>>>>> warning here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7462. I > >> will > >>>>>> only apply this to versions >= 1.0 for now. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >
