+1 On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Stefan Richter <s.rich...@data-artisans.com > wrote:
> +1 > > > Am 22.08.2017 um 18:07 schrieb Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>: > > > > Please go ahead +1 > > > > Thank you for taking care! > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >>> On 22. Aug 2017, at 18:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Quick update: If there are no objections, I will start looking into > >>>> how to stop serving the docs for Flink < 1.0 after tomorrow. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>> Thanks for your early feedback Kostas and Ted. > >>>>> > >>>>> @Kostas: I have a proposal for a more obvious warning here: > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4553 Would appreciate comments > in > >>>>> that PR too :-) > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Without any upgrade path, the old versions are not useful. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 on redirecting doc to stable release(s). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Kostas Kloudas < > >>>> k.klou...@data-artisans.com > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Ufuk, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think that this is a nice change! > >>>>>>> Thanks Ufuk for opening the discussion. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think that broken/redirect links are not an issue, > >>>>>>> as either way the information provided is far outdated > >>>>>>> (== wrong). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> As for the warning, we cannot put it in the header instead > >>>>>>> of the footer? Sth like, this page may contain outdated info, > >>>>>>> please refer to XXX for an updated version. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Kostas > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 2017, at 6:02 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hey devs, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I would like to stop serving the documentation for all Flink > >> versions > >>>>>>>> prior to 1.0. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Do you have any concerns about this? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> These Flink versions are very old without any upgrade path to > newer > >>>>>>>> versions but they still get a lot of traffic and most new users > >> don't > >>>>>>>> realize that they are looking at a very outdated docs page. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Even with a stronger warning about being outdated, I don't see a > >>>> point > >>>>>>>> in serving them. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If we choose to do this, I would redirect these ancient pages to > the > >>>>>>>> docs of the latest stable release and update the release process > >> Wiki > >>>>>>>> page to update those redirects etc. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> This will mean that some links in old StackOverflow questions and > >> the > >>>>>>>> mailing list archives will be broken/redirected. If you have > >> concerns > >>>>>>>> about this, please raise your voice in this thread. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> – Ufuk > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> PS: I've created an issue to improve the visibility of the > outdated > >>>>>>>> warning here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7462. I > >>>> will > >>>>>>>> only apply this to versions >= 1.0 for now. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
