Sorry to join the discussion after all things seems been settled down
already, but i noticed we may need another component: "SQL / operators".
Do we still have chance to add it?

Best,
Kurt


On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:59 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:

> Okay, I will go with "Connectors / Misc" if nobody objects.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:33 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > "Connectors / Misc"
> >
> > On 27.02.2019 15:20, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > > I have now started renaming the components.
> > > You can track my progress on the wiki page:
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Proposal+for+new+JIRA+Components
> > >
> > >
> > > Since one has to re-open closed tickets to update their component, I
> will
> > > focus on the open tickets with the migration.
> > > I have asked Infra to change the permissions so that we can change the
> > > components of closed tickets as well.
> > >
> > > What do you think about a "Connectors / New" (or Common) component for
> > > tracking new connectors?
> > > I don't know where to place tickets like
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8486.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 3:59 PM jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I agree with Robert from now.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Jincheng
> > >>
> > >> Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> 于2019年2月26日周二 下午7:03写道:
> > >>
> > >>> Thank you for the suggestion.
> > >>>
> > >>> Would this be "Runtime / State TTL" ?
> > >>>
> > >>> How about adding this once we really have collected enough tickets to
> > >>> justify a separate component?
> > >>> The number of components is quite high already, and I would like to
> > avoid
> > >>> expanding it further too early.
> > >>> Unless others also ask for it, I'm against it for now :)
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:28 AM Andrey Zagrebin <
> and...@ververica.com
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thank you for such useful effort, Robert!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I would also suggest a separate tag for state TTL, like queryable
> > >> state.
> > >>>> There might be not so many issues atm but it might help in future.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Andrey
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:02 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org
> >
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> The proposal has been approved with
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> +1 votes:
> > >>>>> - Timo
> > >>>>> - Robert
> > >>>>> - Jincheng
> > >>>>> - Shengjk1
> > >>>>> - Chesnay
> > >>>>> - Till
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> With +4 PMC votes, the vote has passed.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks everybody!
> > >>>>> I'll soon start with this effort!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:28 PM Till Rohrmann <
> trohrm...@apache.org>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:06 AM Chesnay Schepler <
> > >>> ches...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 25.02.2019 09:51, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> You are right. I've fixed it:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=103089605&selectedPageVersions=7&selectedPageVersions=6
> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 4:27 PM Chesnay Schepler <
> > >>>> ches...@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>> <mailto:ches...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>      Then the respective target components should have a "split
> > >>>>>>>>      Job-Submission" migration path attached to them.
> > >>>>>>>>      None of the 3 components you just listed have this.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>      On 21.02.2019 16:10, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>      > Thank you for the minor issues you've found. I addressed
> > >>> them:
> > >>>>>>>>      >
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=103089605&selectedPageVersions=6&selectedPageVersions=5
> > >>>>>>>>      >
> > >>>>>>>>      > @Chesnay: Regarding the "Job-Submission": I quickly
> looked
> > >>>> over
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>      > tickets. Many of them clearly fit into categories like
> > >> YARN,
> > >>>>>>>>      "Runtime / Web
> > >>>>>>>>      > Frontend", "Deployment / Scripts". For the difficult
> > >> cases,
> > >>>>>>>>      we'll find a
> > >>>>>>>>      > solution :)
> > >>>>>>>>      >
> > >>>>>>>>      >
> > >>>>>>>>      > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 5:57 AM shengjk1 <
> > >>> jsjsjs1...@163.com
> > >>>>>>>>      <mailto:jsjsjs1...@163.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>      >
> > >>>>>>>>      >> +1 for the vote
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> Also agree with Chesnay Schepler.
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> There area few minor things  I just noticed, except as
> > >>>>>>>>      mentioned in the
> > >>>>>>>>      >> Chesnay Schepler email:
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> * "Scala Shell" is to be renamed to "Scala Shell", but
> it
> > >>>>>>>>      should say keep
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>      >> Shengjk1
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> On 02/20/2019 18:31,Chesnay Schepler<ches...@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>      <mailto:ches...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>      >> There area few minor things I just noticed:
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> * "Job-Submission" is to be merged into "Command Line
> > >>>> Client",
> > >>>>>>>>      but I'm
> > >>>>>>>>      >> certain that there are issue in that category that
> > >>> also/only
> > >>>>>>> apply
> > >>>>>>>>      >> to REST. The same applies to Web Client I suppose, which
> > >>>> should
> > >>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>      >> primarily about the WebFrontend / REST API.
> > >>>>>>>>      >> * "Quickstarts" is to be renamed to "Quickstarts", but
> it
> > >>>>>>>>      should say keep
> > >>>>>>>>      >> * Gelly/CEP should be marked as renamed
> > >>>>>>>>      >> * there is no "Twitter" nor "Wikiedits" component that
> > >>> could
> > >>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>      moved
> > >>>>>>>>      >> to "Examples"
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> The first point is the important one, whereas the rest
> > >> are
> > >>>>>>>>      probably just
> > >>>>>>>>      >> things that slipped through while updating the proposal.
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> On 20.02.2019 11:04, Timo Walther wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>      >> +1
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> Thanks for the proposal.
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> Timo
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> Am 20.02.19 um 10:53 schrieb Robert Metzger:
> > >>>>>>>>      >> Hey all,
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> As discussed in the last days, I'm proposing to clean up
> > >>> and
> > >>>>>>>>      >> reorganize our
> > >>>>>>>>      >> JIRA tickets.
> > >>>>>>>>      >> Chesnay proposed to approve the final proposal through a
> > >>>> VOTE.
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> Here is the proposal:
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Proposal+for+new+JIRA+Components
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> Please vote with:
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> [  ] +1 to agree
> > >>>>>>>>      >> [  ]   0 I have no strong opinion
> > >>>>>>>>      >> [  ]  -1 to object on the following grounds: ...
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >> The vote will end on Monday, Feb 25th, 2019, at 11am
> CET.
> > >>>>>>>>      >> The vote will be accepted if there are at least 3 PMC
> +1s
> > >>> and
> > >>>>> no
> > >>>>>>>>      >> objections.
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>      >>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to