No problem. I can not decide this, because I don't know the domain enough. I've added a new "Runtime / Operators <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+FLINK+AND+component+%3D+%22Runtime+%2F+Operators%22>" component, which is intended to contain all the API operators, including SQL. As far as I understood, the idea is that the SQL API and programming APIs share the same set of operators (in the long run). With 1240 issues, the "API / Table SQL" component is one of the largest components. It definitively makes sense to split the SQL-related issues into a good set of components.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 3:19 PM Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry to join the discussion after all things seems been settled down > already, but i noticed we may need another component: "SQL / operators". > Do we still have chance to add it? > > Best, > Kurt > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:59 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Okay, I will go with "Connectors / Misc" if nobody objects. > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:33 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > "Connectors / Misc" > > > > > > On 27.02.2019 15:20, Robert Metzger wrote: > > > > I have now started renaming the components. > > > > You can track my progress on the wiki page: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Proposal+for+new+JIRA+Components > > > > > > > > > > > > Since one has to re-open closed tickets to update their component, I > > will > > > > focus on the open tickets with the migration. > > > > I have asked Infra to change the permissions so that we can change > the > > > > components of closed tickets as well. > > > > > > > > What do you think about a "Connectors / New" (or Common) component > for > > > > tracking new connectors? > > > > I don't know where to place tickets like > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8486. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 3:59 PM jincheng sun < > sunjincheng...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I agree with Robert from now. > > > >> > > > >> Best, > > > >> Jincheng > > > >> > > > >> Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> 于2019年2月26日周二 下午7:03写道： > > > >> > > > >>> Thank you for the suggestion. > > > >>> > > > >>> Would this be "Runtime / State TTL" ? > > > >>> > > > >>> How about adding this once we really have collected enough tickets > to > > > >>> justify a separate component? > > > >>> The number of components is quite high already, and I would like to > > > avoid > > > >>> expanding it further too early. > > > >>> Unless others also ask for it, I'm against it for now :) > > > >>> > > > >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:28 AM Andrey Zagrebin < > > and...@ververica.com > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Hi all, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thank you for such useful effort, Robert! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I would also suggest a separate tag for state TTL, like queryable > > > >> state. > > > >>>> There might be not so many issues atm but it might help in future. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > >>>> Andrey > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:02 PM Robert Metzger < > rmetz...@apache.org > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> The proposal has been approved with > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> +1 votes: > > > >>>>> - Timo > > > >>>>> - Robert > > > >>>>> - Jincheng > > > >>>>> - Shengjk1 > > > >>>>> - Chesnay > > > >>>>> - Till > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> With +4 PMC votes, the vote has passed. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Thanks everybody! > > > >>>>> I'll soon start with this effort! > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:28 PM Till Rohrmann < > > trohrm...@apache.org> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:06 AM Chesnay Schepler < > > > >>> ches...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On 25.02.2019 09:51, Robert Metzger wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> You are right. I've fixed it: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=103089605&selectedPageVersions=7&selectedPageVersions=6 > > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 4:27 PM Chesnay Schepler < > > > >>>> ches...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>> <mailto:ches...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Then the respective target components should have a > "split > > > >>>>>>>> Job-Submission" migration path attached to them. > > > >>>>>>>> None of the 3 components you just listed have this. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On 21.02.2019 16:10, Robert Metzger wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > Thank you for the minor issues you've found. I > addressed > > > >>> them: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=103089605&selectedPageVersions=6&selectedPageVersions=5 > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > @Chesnay: Regarding the "Job-Submission": I quickly > > looked > > > >>>> over > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>> > tickets. Many of them clearly fit into categories like > > > >> YARN, > > > >>>>>>>> "Runtime / Web > > > >>>>>>>> > Frontend", "Deployment / Scripts". For the difficult > > > >> cases, > > > >>>>>>>> we'll find a > > > >>>>>>>> > solution :) > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 5:57 AM shengjk1 < > > > >>> jsjsjs1...@163.com > > > >>>>>>>> <mailto:jsjsjs1...@163.com>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> >> +1 for the vote > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> Also agree with Chesnay Schepler. > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> There area few minor things I just noticed, except as > > > >>>>>>>> mentioned in the > > > >>>>>>>> >> Chesnay Schepler email: > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> * "Scala Shell" is to be renamed to "Scala Shell", but > > it > > > >>>>>>>> should say keep > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> Best, > > > >>>>>>>> >> Shengjk1 > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> On 02/20/2019 18:31，Chesnay Schepler< > ches...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>> <mailto:ches...@apache.org>> wrote： > > > >>>>>>>> >> There area few minor things I just noticed: > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> * "Job-Submission" is to be merged into "Command Line > > > >>>> Client", > > > >>>>>>>> but I'm > > > >>>>>>>> >> certain that there are issue in that category that > > > >>> also/only > > > >>>>>>> apply > > > >>>>>>>> >> to REST. The same applies to Web Client I suppose, > which > > > >>>> should > > > >>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>> >> primarily about the WebFrontend / REST API. > > > >>>>>>>> >> * "Quickstarts" is to be renamed to "Quickstarts", but > > it > > > >>>>>>>> should say keep > > > >>>>>>>> >> * Gelly/CEP should be marked as renamed > > > >>>>>>>> >> * there is no "Twitter" nor "Wikiedits" component that > > > >>> could > > > >>>> be > > > >>>>>>>> moved > > > >>>>>>>> >> to "Examples" > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> The first point is the important one, whereas the rest > > > >> are > > > >>>>>>>> probably just > > > >>>>>>>> >> things that slipped through while updating the > proposal. > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> On 20.02.2019 11:04, Timo Walther wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> >> +1 > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> Thanks for the proposal. > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> Timo > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> Am 20.02.19 um 10:53 schrieb Robert Metzger: > > > >>>>>>>> >> Hey all, > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> As discussed in the last days, I'm proposing to clean > up > > > >>> and > > > >>>>>>>> >> reorganize our > > > >>>>>>>> >> JIRA tickets. > > > >>>>>>>> >> Chesnay proposed to approve the final proposal > through a > > > >>>> VOTE. > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> Here is the proposal: > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Proposal+for+new+JIRA+Components > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> Please vote with: > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> [ ] +1 to agree > > > >>>>>>>> >> [ ] 0 I have no strong opinion > > > >>>>>>>> >> [ ] -1 to object on the following grounds: ... > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> The vote will end on Monday, Feb 25th, 2019, at 11am > > CET. > > > >>>>>>>> >> The vote will be accepted if there are at least 3 PMC > > +1s > > > >>> and > > > >>>>> no > > > >>>>>>>> >> objections. > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > >
