Hi everyone, I'm here to re-start the voting process for FLIP-49 [1], with respect to consensus reached in this thread [2] regarding some new comments and concerns.
This voting will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it Sep. 5, 14:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. Thank you~ Xintong Song [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-49%3A+Unified+Memory+Configuration+for+TaskExecutors [2] http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-49-Unified-Memory-Configuration-for-TaskExecutors-td31436.html On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 9:29 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote: > Alright, then let's keep the discussion in the DISCUSS mailing thread, and > see whether we need to restart the vote. > > Thank you~ > > Xintong Song > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:12 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> I had a couple of comments concerning the implementation plan. I've posted >> them to the original discussion thread. Depending on the outcome of this >> discussion we might need to restart the vote. >> >> Cheers, >> Till >> >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:14 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I would like to start the voting process for FLIP-49 [1], which is >> > discussed and reached consensus in this thread [2]. >> > >> > This voting will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it >> Aug. >> > 30 10:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. >> > >> > Thank you~ >> > >> > Xintong Song >> > >> > >> > [1] >> > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-49%3A+Unified+Memory+Configuration+for+TaskExecutors >> > [2] >> > >> > >> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-49-Unified-Memory-Configuration-for-TaskExecutors-td31436.html >> > >> >