Thanks Chesnay,

+1 to make it official that we no longer actively develop them but user can
still use.

Best,
Jingsong Lee

On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 4:47 AM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote:

> Users can continue to use the 1.9 versions of the 0.8/0.9 connectors
> with future versions of Flink.
>
> We just make it official that we no longer actively develop them,
>
> On 08/12/2019 12:22, Becket Qin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Sorry for being late on this thread. My hunch is that 0.8 and 0.9 is old
> > enough to deprecate. However, after checking the downloads statistics
> from
> > Apache, I am not completely sure anymore.
> >
> > Here are some Kafka broker jar download stats from the past month
> according
> > to Apache Nexus[1]. Since Flink only supports Scala 2.11, I only listed
> > Scala 2.11 here.
> >
> > Scala 2.11:
> > version downloads percentage
> > 0.8.2.1 215478 27.01%
> > 2.0.1 155984 19.55%
> > 1.1.0 85794 10.75%
> > 1.0.1 53745 6.74%
> > 0.9.0.1 39825 4.99%
> >
> > And out of all Scala versions in the broker downloads, Scala 2.11
> accounts
> > about 75% of the total downloads. From all the numbers I can see, it
> looks
> > there are about 1/4 of the users still using Kafka 0.8. I have to admit
> it
> > is also quite counter intuitive for me. I am pretty sure that new users
> are
> > not going to use Kafka 0.8 anymore, but the existing users are moving
> > slowly.
> >
> > However, these stats may not necessarily prevent us from dropping
> connector
> > support for Kafka 0.8 and 0.9, if we assume the users are not going to
> > upgrade their Flink version, which might be the case given they did not
> > upgrade their Kafka versions for long either.
> >
> > To avoid surprises, I'd still prefer following the proper deprecation
> > process. i.e. mark the connectors as deprecated, announce the deprecation
> > plan in the release note, and remove them 1-2 releases later if we don't
> > hear complaints from the users.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >
> > [1] https://repository.apache.org/#central-stat
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 12:42 AM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 3:46 AM Benchao Li <libenc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 for dropping.
> >>>
> >>> Zhenghua Gao <doc...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月5日周四 下午4:05写道:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 for dropping.
> >>>>
> >>>> *Best Regards,*
> >>>> *Zhenghua Gao*
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 11:08 AM Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 for dropping them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just FYI: there was a similar discussion few months ago [1].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> >>
> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Drop-older-versions-of-Kafka-Connectors-0-9-0-10-for-Flink-1-10-td29916.html#a29997
> >>>>> 在 2019年12月5日,上午10:29,vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com> 写道:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月5日周四 上午10:26写道:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1  for drop it, and Thanks for bring up this discussion Chesnay!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Jincheng
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月5日周四 上午10:19写道:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 for dropping, also cc'ed user mailing list.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>> Jark
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 03:39, Konstantin Knauf <
> >>>> konstan...@ververica.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Chesnay,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1 for dropping. I have not heard from any user using 0.8 or 0.9
> >>> for
> >>>> a
> >>>>>>> long
> >>>>>>>> while.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Konstantin
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 1:57 PM Chesnay Schepler <
> >>> ches...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> What's everyone's take on dropping the Kafka 0.8/0.9 connectors
> >>>> from
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> Flink codebase?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> We haven't touched either of them for the 1.10 release, and it
> >>>> seems
> >>>>>>>>> quite unlikely that we will do so in the future.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> We could finally close a number of test stability tickets that
> >>> have
> >>>>>>> been
> >>>>>>>>> lingering for quite a while.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Chesnay
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Solutions Architect
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache
> >> Flink
> >>>>>>>> Conference
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
> >>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> >>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung
> >>> Jason,
> >>>> Ji
> >>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Benchao Li
> >>> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking
> University
> >>> Tel:+86-15650713730
> >>> Email: libenc...@gmail.com; libenc...@pku.edu.cn
> >>>
>
>

-- 
Best, Jingsong Lee

Reply via email to