Hi Timo, Jack,
Well, I added additional column to describe the return type of each
function and
updated the google doc.

Best,
Forward

Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2020年1月3日周五 下午5:48写道:

> Hi Timo,
>
> That's a good point.
> We didn't introduce any new types. We will use the function definition
> defined by Calcite[1].
> So all the functions return STRING/BOOLEAN.
>
> Hi Forward,
> I think we may need an additional column to describe the return type of
> each function.
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> [1]:
>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/sql/fun/SqlJsonQueryFunction.java
>
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 17:30, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry for jumping into the discussion so late. I had a quick look at the
> > FLIP. It looks very nice and detailed. I have one question that I could
> > not find in the FLIP itself. Maybe it is hidden in the long discussion
> > thread.
> >
> > What are the return types of all functions? Do we introduce new types
> > with this FLIP? Also the RAW types should be avoided. Do all functions
> > return STRING/BOOLEAN?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Timo
> >
> >
> > On 31.12.19 09:39, Hequn Cheng wrote:
> > > Thanks a lot for the update. +1 to start a vote.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 2:38 PM Forward Xu <forwardxu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Jark, Hequn,
> > >>
> > >> I have updated the documentation.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >>
> > >> Forward
> > >>
> > >> Forward Xu <forwardxu...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月29日周日 下午4:01写道:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Jark, Hequn,
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you very much, Introducing new `TableSymbol`s sounds like a
> good
> > >>> idea. +1 for the proposal.
> > >>>
> > >>> I think this idea is good, I will add this in the documentation.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Best, Forward
> > >>>
> > >>> Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月29日周日 下午3:41写道:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Jark,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Introducing new `TableSymbol`s sounds like a good idea. +1 for the
> > >>>> proposal.
> > >>>> @ForwardXu what do you think? Would be great if the document can be
> > >>>> updated
> > >>>> accordingly.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best, Hequn
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 4:14 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks for looking into the design Hequn. I agree it would be great
> > to
> > >>>>> have a full story design.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> For the ON ERROR and ON EMPTY clause in Table API, some initial
> > >>>>> thoughts in my mind is that
> > >>>>> we can introduce some new `TableSymbol`s as the second parameter of
> > >> json
> > >>>>> function, e.g. `JsonErrorStrategy`.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> For example,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> JSON_VALUE(v, 'lax $.b' ERROR ON ERROR)
> > >>>>> == is equal to Table API ==>
> > >>>>> v.jsonValue("lax $.b", JsonErrorStrategy.ERROR)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best,
> > >>>>> Jark
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 at 23:37, Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi Jark & ForwardXu,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The design doc looks very nice! Only some minor feedback from my
> > >> side.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> As calcite has already implemented the JSON functions, I would
> > >> suppose
> > >>>>>> the semantics and implementation are right for SQL.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> For TableAPI, I think the most important is to keep align with the
> > >>>>>> SQL(which has also been mentioned by Jark in the previous
> > >> discussion).
> > >>>> Have
> > >>>>>> an equivalent feature set for all APIs and maintain it otherwise
> > >>>> confusion
> > >>>>>> increases especially when more and more functions are added. The
> > >>>> document
> > >>>>>> has documented how to support TableAPI. I think this is very good!
> > >> And
> > >>>> it
> > >>>>>> would be better to also include ON ERROR or ON EMPTY for Table
> API.
> > >> We
> > >>>> can
> > >>>>>> implement these features step by step, but maybe we should design
> > all
> > >>>> these
> > >>>>>> once for all to avoid API changes later. Meanwhile, these features
> > >> are
> > >>>> also
> > >>>>>> commonly required by users.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Would be great to also have your opinions!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>> Hequn
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 10:15 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi Forward,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks for creating the FLIP. +1 to start a vote.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>   @Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> @Kurt Young <
> > ykt...@gmail.com>
> > >> ,
> > >>>>>>> could you help to review the design doc too?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>> Jark
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 10:10, tison <wander4...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> modified:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/b3c0265cc2b660fe11ce550b84a831a7606de12908ff7ff0959a4794@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to