+1
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021, at 11:02 AM, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote: > +1 > > On 27/01/2021 11:00, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > > +1 > > > > While I don't think the filesystem is really useless, in it's current > > state it is not maintainable, and so far no one rose up to remedy this. > > > > On 1/27/2021 10:57 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> I'm almost always in favour of removing old code instead of > >> continuing to let it rot. > >> > >> Best, > >> Aljoscha > >> > >> On 2021/01/26 14:11, Robert Metzger wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> during a security maintenance PR [1], Chesnay noticed that the > >>> flink-swift-fs-hadoop module is lacking test coverage [2]. > >>> Also, there hasn't been any substantial change since 2018, when it was > >>> introduced. > >>> On the user@ ML, I could not find any proof of significant use of the > >>> module (no one mentioned any problems with it). > >>> > >>> *I propose to remove this module in Flink 1.13*. Otherwise, we would > >>> release a module with known vulnerable dependencies, and an unknown > >>> stability. > >>> If there are users, they can still use the 1.12.0 release of it. If we > >>> notice that there are a lot of users, we can reintroduce the FS, and > >>> add > >>> proper tests for it. > >>> > >>> Please let me know if you have any concerns, otherwise, I'll remove it. > >>> > >>> > >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14749 > >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20804 > > > > > > > > *Attachments:* > * signature.asc
