Hi Ingo, thanks for your feedback.

Do you think that two release cycles per graduation step would be long
enough or should it be longer?

Cheers,
Till

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:29 PM Ingo Bürk <i...@ververica.com> wrote:

> Hi Till,
>
> Overall I whole-heartedly agree with the proposals in this FLIP. Thank you
> for starting this discussion as well! This seems like something that could
> be tested quite nicely with ArchUnit as well; I'll be happy to help should
> the FLIP be accepted.
>
> > I would propose per default a single release.
>
> The step from PublicEvolving to Public feels more important to me, and I
> would personally suggest making this transition a bit longer. We have a bit
> of a chicken-egg problem here, because the goal of your FLIP is,
> ultimately, also to motivate faster adoption of new Flink versions, but the
> status quo prevents that; if we mature APIs too quickly, we risk losing out
> on important feedback. Therefore, I would propose starting slower here, and
> rather think about shortening that cycle in the future.
>
>
> Best
> Ingo
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 3:57 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > As promised, here is the follow-up FLIP [1] for discussing how we can
> > ensure that newly introduced APIs are being stabilized over time. This
> FLIP
> > is related to FLIP-196 [2].
> >
> > The idea of FLIP-197 is to introduce an API graduation process that
> forces
> > us to increase the API stability guarantee unless there is a very good
> > reason not to do so. So the proposal is to reverse the process from
> opt-in
> > (increasing the stability guarantee explicitly) to opt-out (deciding that
> > an API cannot be graduated with a good reason).
> >
> > Since every process breaks if it is not automated, we propose a richer
> set
> > of API stability annotations that can capture enough information so that
> we
> > can implement a test that fails if we fail to follow the process.
> >
> > Looking forward to your feedback.
> >
> > Hopefully, we can provide our users a better experience when working with
> > Flink because we offer more stable APIs and make them available faster.
> >
> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/J5eqCw
> > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/IJeqCw
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
>

Reply via email to