Thanks for the FLIP, Archit. +1 from me as well. This would be very useful for us and others in the community given the same issue was raised earlier as well.
Regards Venkata krishnan On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 4:03 PM Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the FLIP, Archit. > > The motivation sounds reasonable and it looks like a straightforward > proposal. +1 from me. > > Thanks, > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 1:30 AM Archit Goyal <argo...@linkedin.com.invalid > > > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I am opening this thread to discuss the proposal to support Yarn ACLs to > > Flink containers which has been documented in FLIP-312 < > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP*312*3A*Add*Yarn*ACLs*to*Flink*Containers__;KyUrKysrKys!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!bQiA3GX9bFf-w6A9M4Aez7RSMYLdvFtjZnlrOSf6N2nQUFuDdnoJ20uujW8RPY1VbLS9P4AfpnqPmkZZOuQ$ > > >. > > > > This FLIP mentions about providing Yarn application ACL mechanism on > Flink > > containers to be able to provide specific rights to users other than the > > one running the Flink application job. This will restrict other users in > > two ways: > > > > * view logs through the Resource Manager job history > > * kill the application > > > > Please feel free to reply to this email thread and share your opinions. > > > > Thanks, > > Archit Goyal > > > > >
