+1 (non-binding), assuming SourceFunction gets added back to the doc as a "nice-to-have". I am glad we've reached a consensus here. Extra thanks to Leonard for coordinating this discussion in particular.
Best, Alex On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 15:43, Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 (non-binding), glad to see we are now on the same page. Thank you all. > > Best regards, > Jing > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 5:18 PM Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding), thanks @xintong for driving this work. > > > > > > Best > > Yun Tang > > ________________________________ > > From: Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 16:35 > > To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0 must-have work items - Round 2 > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Zhu > > > > Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> 于2023年7月26日周三 15:40写道： > > > > > > Thanks @xingtong for driving the work. > > > > > > +1(binding) > > > > > > Best, > > > Leonard > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 2023, at 3:18 PM, Konstantin Knauf < > > knauf.konstan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Xingtong, > > > > > > > > yes, I am fine with the conclusion for SourceFunction. I chatted with > > > > Leonard a bit last night. Let's continue this vote. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the clarification, > > > > > > > > Konstantin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Mi., 26. Juli 2023 um 04:03 Uhr schrieb Xintong Song < > > > > tonysong...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > >> Hi Konstantin, > > > >> > > > >> It seems the offline discussion has already taken place [1], and > part > > of > > > >> the outcome is that removal of SourceFunction would be a > > *nice-to-have* > > > >> item for release 2.0 which may not block this *must-have* vote. Do > > you have > > > >> different opinions about the conclusions in [1]? > > > >> > > > >> If there are still concerns, and the discussion around this topic > > needs to > > > >> be continued, then I'd suggest (as I mentioned in [2]) not to > further > > block > > > >> this vote (i.e. the decision on other must-have items). Release 2.0 > > still > > > >> has a long way to go, and it is likely we need to review and update > > the > > > >> list every once in a while. We can update the list with another vote > > if > > > >> later we decide to add the removal of SourceFunction to the > must-have > > list. > > > >> > > > >> WDYT? > > > >> > > > >> Best, > > > >> > > > >> Xintong > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/yyw52k45x2sp1jszldtdx7hc98n72w7k > > > >> [2] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/j5d5022ky8k5t088ffm03727o5g9x9jr > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 8:49 PM Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I assume this vote includes a decision to not removing > > > >>> SourceFunction/SinkFunction in Flink 2.0 (as it has been removed > > from the > > > >>> table). If this is the case, I don't think, this discussion has > > > >> concluded. > > > >>> There are multiple contributors like myself, Martijn, Alex Fedulov > > and > > > >>> Maximilian Michels, who have indicated they would be in favor of > > > >>> deprecating/dropping them. This Source/Sink Function discussion > > seems to > > > >> go > > > >>> in circles in general. I am wondering if it makes sense to have a > > call > > > >>> about this instead of repeating mailing list discussions. > > > >>> > > > >>> Am Di., 25. Juli 2023 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb Yu Li <car...@gmail.com > >: > > > >>> > > > >>>> +1 (binding) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks for driving this, Xintong! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Best Regards, > > > >>>> Yu > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 at 18:28, Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> +1 (binding) > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Thanks for driving the discussion through and for all the efforts > > in > > > >>>>> resolving the complexities :-) > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Best > > > >>>>> Yuan > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:23 PM Xintong Song < > > tonysong...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I'd like to start another round of VOTE for the must-have work > > > >> items > > > >>>> for > > > >>>>>> release 2.0 [1]. The corresponding discussion thread is [2], and > > > >> the > > > >>>>>> previous voting thread is [3]. All comments from the previous > > > >> voting > > > >>>>> thread > > > >>>>>> have been addressed. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Please note that once the vote is approved, any changes to the > > > >>>> must-have > > > >>>>>> items (adding / removing must-have items, changing the priority) > > > >>>> requires > > > >>>>>> another vote. Assigning contributors / reviewers, updating > > > >>>> descriptions / > > > >>>>>> progress, changes to nice-to-have items do not require another > > > >> vote. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> The vote will be open until at least July 25, following the > > > >> consensus > > > >>>>>> voting process. Votes of PMC members are binding. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Xintong > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/2.0+Release > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [2] > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3dkdypyrovd3txzodn07lgdwtwvhgk4 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [3] > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/r0y9syc6k5nmcxvnd0hj33htdpdj9k6m > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> https://twitter.com/snntrable > > > >>> https://github.com/knaufk > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Konstantin Knauf* > > > > knauf.konstan...@gmail.com > > > > > >
