Thanks Sergey for the great work.

I feel doubt about the conclusion that "don't try to load a savepoint from a 
Java 8/11/17 build due to bummping to scala-2.12.18", since the snapshotted 
state (operator/keyed state-backend),  and most key/value serializer snapshots 
are generated by pure-java code. The only left part is that the developer uses 
scala UDF or scala types for key/value types. However, since all user-facing 
scala APIs have been deprecated [1], I don't think we have so many cases. Maybe 
we can give descriptions without such strong suggestions.

Please correct me if I am wrong.


[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29740

Best
Yun Tang

________________________________
From: Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 16:43
To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Experimental Java 21 support now available on master

Thanks Sergey for the great work!

Best,
Rui

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 4:42 PM Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Cool !
>
> Thanks Sergey for the great effort and all involved.
>
>
> Best,
> Leonard
>
> > 2023年11月29日 下午4:31,Swapnal Varma <swapnal...@gmail.com> 写道:
> >
> > Congratulations Sergey, and everyone involved!
> >
> > Excited to work with and on this!
> >
> > Best,
> > Swapnal
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023, 13:58 Sergey Nuyanzin, <snuyan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The master branch now builds and runs with Java 21 out-of-the-box.
> >>
> >> Notes:
> >> - a nightly cron build was set up.
> >> - In Java 21 builds, Scala is being bumped to 2.12.18
> >> which causes incompatibilities within Flink;
> >> i.e. don't try to load a savepoint from a Java 8/11/17 build
> >> - All the tests that are being skipped on Java 11/17
> >> are also skipped on Java 21.
> >>
> >> Huge shout-out to everyone participating
> >> in review of my Java 21 related PRs
> >>
> >> If you run into any issues, please report it in FLINK-33163
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33163> .
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >> Sergey
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to