Thanks for pointing to FLIP-498, Timo. I missed that. >From the FLIP-498 discussion thread, it is unclear to me whether people had agreed to "discard" FLIP-313. The FLIP-498 discussion mentioned that we may potentially still add the hint based options later, which is what was proposed in FLIP-313. And I think we already see use cases in per function instance options instead of job level configs.
@Timo, can you clarify that by -1, do you want to veto the technical proposal of FLIP-313, or do you mean you want to have yet another FLIP (other than FLIP-498) to add the hint based options? And why? BTW, I feel that we can do better in dealing with similar FLIPs from different contributors as well as FLIPs dormant for long. I'll start a separate discussion on that rather than derail this thread. Thanks, Jiangjie (Becket) Qin On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 3:22 AM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: > -1 > > This FLIP has been subsumed by FLIP-498: AsyncTableFunction for async > table function support [1]. In the discussion for FLIP-498, we decided > to discard FLIP-313 as it has been abandoned for a while. > > I hope this is ok for everyone. @Alan might give some timeline when this > feature will land? > > Cheers, > Timo > > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-498%3A+AsyncTableFunction+for+async+table+function+support > > > On 26.05.25 07:51, Teunissen, F.G.J. (Fred) wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > We currently use a custom async table source and join it using FOR > SYSTEM TIME AS OF .... This approach has some challenges, especially when > used after aggregations . > > > > Introducing support for an async UDTF would allow us to perform the join > using LATERAL TABLE, which would greatly simplify the query structure and > improve maintainability. > > > > Kind regards, > > Fred Teunissen > > > > From: Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> > > Date: Thursday, 22 May 2025 at 17:08 > > To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-313: Add support of User Defined > AsyncTableFunction > > > > I just realized this FLIP has never been voted to pass. > > > > +1 to the FLIP. > > This is actually something long overdue. I feel it is even more like a > bug > > that we need to fix than a feature. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 7:36 PM Aitozi <gjying1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi devs: > >> The last comments in [1] has been addressed, I'd like to restart > this > >> vote thread. > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (until June 29th, 10:00AM > GMT) > >> unless there is an objection or an insufficient number of votes. > >> > >> [1] > https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2F7vk1799ryvrz4lsm5254q64ctm89mx2l&data=05%7C02%7CFred.Teunissen%40ing.com%7C065ec6c9cf4b4473046c08dd994279de%7C587b6ea13db94fe1a9d785d4c64ce5cc%7C0%7C0%7C638835232969844437%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=sD%2Fwr7xdTScWh464iYJLgzW%2BdE0toaLGloZ5Jtmz%2F1U%3D&reserved=0 > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/7vk1799ryvrz4lsm5254q64ctm89mx2l> > >> [2] > >> > >> > https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FFLINK%2FFLIP-313%253A%2BAdd%2Bsupport%2Bof%2BUser%2BDefined%2BAsyncTableFunction&data=05%7C02%7CFred.Teunissen%40ing.com%7C065ec6c9cf4b4473046c08dd994279de%7C587b6ea13db94fe1a9d785d4c64ce5cc%7C0%7C0%7C638835232969866359%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=IP%2FRjxDZqex0oXzKW58jAElrr7aWFu%2FNsouo7aYWB1E%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-313%3A+Add+support+of+User+Defined+AsyncTableFunction > > > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Aitozi > >> > >> Aitozi <gjying1...@gmail.com> 于2023年6月14日周三 09:47写道： > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> Thanks for all the feedback about FLIP-313: Add support of User > >>> Defined AsyncTableFunction[1]. Based on the discussion [2], we have > come > >> to > >>> a consensus, so I would like to start a vote. > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (until June 19th, 10:00AM > >> GMT) > >>> unless there is an objection or an insufficient number of votes. > >>> > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > >> > https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FFLINK%2FFLIP-313%253A%2BAdd%2Bsupport%2Bof%2BUser%2BDefined%2BAsyncTableFunction&data=05%7C02%7CFred.Teunissen%40ing.com%7C065ec6c9cf4b4473046c08dd994279de%7C587b6ea13db94fe1a9d785d4c64ce5cc%7C0%7C0%7C638835232969879042%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=q7wFos19f0UtOLW6q0HhrtzGKS5THv5uQtLCxc3ZzfA%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-313%3A+Add+support+of+User+Defined+AsyncTableFunction > > > >>> [2] > https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2F7vk1799ryvrz4lsm5254q64ctm89mx2l&data=05%7C02%7CFred.Teunissen%40ing.com%7C065ec6c9cf4b4473046c08dd994279de%7C587b6ea13db94fe1a9d785d4c64ce5cc%7C0%7C0%7C638835232969891732%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=k5EGhhb5tWkqRLRY%2F1fuNJqCaKvtQB7vKFtbuwPkVPk%3D&reserved=0 > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/7vk1799ryvrz4lsm5254q64ctm89mx2l> > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Aitozi > >>> > >> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ATTENTION: > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the > intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or > disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the message > immediately. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > >
