We don't have any tests for the scala api yet, because in 95% it just wraps the java api, no new logic except for the aggregations which should have tests indeed. The api itself have proper docs we just didn't update the streaming-guide.
But I think since the streaming api is still in a beta phase its better to have working features out for testing. This speeds up development a lot for us. This can be included in the release candidate even today, since its ready. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > Do we have any tests for the scala streaming API ? > With tests and documentation missing there is very little time. > > I hope that we get the first release candidate out tomorrow. > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Yes, we can cherry-pick it, thats not a problem. > > > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Can you cherry-pick it onto the 0.8 branch? > > > > > > If that works well and the main streaming authors (Marton, Gyula, > Paris, > > > Jonas, Gabor, ...) back that decision, I would go for it. > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > I agree to include it, the only thing missing there is the streaming > > > guide > > > > for scala. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Paris Carbone <par...@kth.se> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone! > > > > > > > > > > While the 0.8 release is on its way, I would suggest we also > include > > > the > > > > > latest streaming scala-api. It is fairly stable, at least as stable > > as > > > > the > > > > > current java streaming api it builds on and it looks quite > > > > straightforward > > > > > as well for new users. > > > > > > > > > > Given that the next release will take a while, we think that it > will > > be > > > > > good to expose the scala api and get some feedback early enough so > we > > > > make > > > > > further improvements for the next release. What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > Paris > > > > > > > > > >
