Mike, 

We could test run gerrit, once our basic git repo is set up. I would also like 
to try using the pull request mechanism as the author credit will never go away 
how much ever branch/merge is done. Until anything is finalized, we should use 
the current setup - then add in Gerrit/pull request mechanism - one issue with 
pull requests is that it does not give a side-by-side view, of current v/s 
proposed code, which might be painful for large codebases.


Thanks,
Hari

-- 
Hari Shreedharan


On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Mike Percy wrote:

> +1! Thanks for proposing this Hari.
> 
> Regarding review tools, I know some projects use Gerrit <
> https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/> which integrates well with Git.
> 
> I'd like to try out how the GitHub pull request flow works before making it
> required, personally. There is something to be said for the current
> attribution system since both the author and reviewer get credit for the
> work, even after branching and merging, etc.
> 
> Regards,
> Mike
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Hari Shreedharan <
> [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Apache infra is now allowing projects to choose git as the primary source
> > control, if the project community choose so. I have been using git svn for
> > commits and git to maintain my repo, but recently there have been issues
> > with the git-svn sync (earlier git mirror had substantial delays - but now
> > it looks like it is missing commits).
> > 
> > I would like to know how many of you would be interested in such a move,
> > to host Flume as wip git repo at Apache. Please note that this is not meant
> > to be a comparison of git and svn, this is just a discussion to gauge the
> > community's interest in using git as the primary source control.
> > 
> > Also, please note that I have not communicated this with ASF Infra about
> > this, and I am not exactly sure how the move would work. I will work on
> > that if there is sufficient interest within the community.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Hari
> > 
> > --
> > Hari Shreedharan
> > 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to